Social Networks; The Realm of Vacuous Mingling

Reign in Acai

Of Elephant and Man
Jun 25, 2003
20,265
628
113
43
Favela of My Dismay
While RC is most certainly a social network it separates itself from the facebooks, myspaces, and friendsters of the world, due to the enlightened & enriching discourse that takes place (Haha). Two weeks ago I gave up checking fagbook and another forum of a similar variety. Since then, my mind has felt less cluttered by the everyday minutia of what Chandra Gerbowitz had for breakfast, or what TV show Jon LeCest became a fan of. Do I really need to know this irrelevant nonsense, must I be this plugged in? It's quite refreshing to disconnect and live in the moment of "unimpeded reality". Why do we as individuals feel the need to be so attuned to everyone in our sphere? Text messaging, facebook poking, glory holing, wtf?!? Leave your cellphones at home and go for a hike, it's not going to kill you! [/End Rant]

[Begin Article]

Social networking websites are causing alarming changes in the brains of young users, an eminent scientist has warned.

Sites such as Facebook, Twitter and Bebo are said to shorten attention spans, encourage instant gratification and make young people more self-centered.

The claims from neuroscientist Susan Greenfield will make disturbing reading for the millions whose social lives depend on logging on to their favourite websites each day.

Facebook founder and CEO Mark Zuckerberg. The popular website has made him a very rich man, but at what cost to human relationships?

But they will strike a chord with parents and teachers who complain that many youngsters lack the ability to communicate or concentrate away from their screens.

More than 150million use Facebook to keep in touch with friends, share photographs and videos and post regular updates of their movements and thoughts.

A further six million have signed up to Twitter, the 'micro-blogging' service that lets users circulate text messages about themselves.

But while the sites are popular - and extremely profitable - a growing number of psychologists and neuroscientists believe they may be doing more harm than good.

Baroness Greenfield, an Oxford University neuroscientist and director of the Royal Institution, believes repeated exposure could effectively 'rewire' the brain.

article-1153583-03A4E2A7000005DC-166_468x286.jpg


Experts are concerned children's online social interactions can 'rewire' the brain

Computer games and fast-paced TV shows were also a factor, she said.

'We know how small babies need constant reassurance that they exist,' she told the Mail yesterday.

'My fear is that these technologies are infantilising the brain into the state of small children who are attracted by buzzing noises and bright lights, who have a small attention span and who live for the moment.'


Professor Susan Greenfield echoed those statements she made during a House of Lords debate earlier this month. Then she argued that exposure to computer games, instant messaging, chat rooms and social networking sites could leave a generation with poor attention spans.

'I often wonder whether real conversation in real time may eventually give way to these sanitized and easier screen dialogues, in much the same way as killing, skinning and butchering an animal to eat has been replaced by the convenience of packages of meat on the supermarket shelf,' she said.

Lady Greenfield told the Lords a teacher of 30 years had told her she had noticed a sharp decline in the ability of her pupils to understand others.

'It is hard to see how living this way on a daily basis will not result in brains, or rather minds, different from those of previous generations,' she said.

She pointed out that autistic people, who usually find it hard to communicate, were particularly comfortable using computers.

'Of course, we do not know whether the current increase in autism is due more to increased awareness and diagnosis of autism, or whether it can - if there is a true increase - be in any way linked to an increased prevalence among people of spending time in screen relationships. Surely it is a point worth considering,' she added.

Psychologists have also argued that digital technology is changing the way we think. They point out that students no longer need to plan essays before starting to write - thanks to word processors they can edit as they go along. Satellite navigation systems have negated the need to decipher maps.

A study by the Broadcaster Audience Research Board found teenagers now spend seven-and-a-half hours a day in front of a screen.

Educational psychologist Jane Healy believes children should be kept away from computer games until they are seven. Most games only trigger the 'flight or fight' region of the brain, rather than the vital areas responsible for reasoning.

Sue Palmer, author of Toxic Childhood, said: 'We are seeing children's brain development damaged because they don't engage in the activity they have engaged in for millennia.

'I'm not against technology and computers. But before they start social networking, they need to learn to make real relationships with people.'
 
here's you:

MAN i sure hate having to eat poison for breakfast every day! fuck society that's forcing me to eat poison! i feel much better since i stopped eating poison! fuck poison it sucks! i'm never going to eat it again! *eats poison*
 

i'm not even going to read that because it's bound to be embarassing

that said i did quit the internet for 6 months or so and it was the best fucking thing. i only re-connected because i need internet access to run my new business. am trying to cut down severely on "casual" internet usage. work only, no play. either way you can't fault me for posting on forums now because i'm just slacking off at work which is legitimate internet usage
 
also i would have posted about how i agreed with the point in the OP article about internet lowering people's attention spans but this thread is boring now
 
I pretty much have spent most of my teens and now at least part of my 20s because I like it when I'm not busy. If I'm busy enough or need to get a lot of work done,I just simply don't get on here. I would almost say that it's not the computers that are the problem, but it's people not understanding that it can be harmful if used to much or in the wrong way. Pretty much like everything.
 
Also, I quite enjoy twitter, because I can see what other people are up to, like authors of blogs and NASA. Facebook can be ace because people like TGD and a few other friends that post articles, and there is always something more to read that I didn't catch.
 
I never understood the appeal of shit like twitter. If you're so damn interested in what people are doing, why not just call them?

I think I login to facebook for about 10 minutes a week (mostly to deny a bunch of shit I saw in my email), and my cell phone has no text messaging service and is only on during work ours for work related things (I'm taking a nap, call me when you need something done).

My problems in Internet usage are based around 2 things: Forums, and gaming. I played left4dead for 8 hours tonight. Literally. 8 straight god damn hours of Left4fuckingDead on Expert. We died often. We didn't care. Time was not a problem to us.

And now I'm gonna go to work and take a nap.
 
I never felt that I use interwebbing stuff instead of actual real social contacts, but it's a nice way to keep up with stuff and people you don't see all that often, and to just kick back and shut off your brain (or maybe use it for somethnig else than your everyday shit) for a while. In short: no worries.
 
Wait. Children use the internet? Children? For what? Fucking social networks? I had absolutely no idea about this.
Sad.
 
A new, dangerous trend is growing among teenagers: text messaging explicit photos of themselves, also known as sexting. Students as young as 12 are exchanging salacious pictures and messages through their cellphones.

"A picture got out of somebody else's older sister and that kinda spread like wildfire through our school," said a tenth grader.
The phenomenon is raging as wildly as their hormones. It's known as sexting or sex texting, sending lewd messages and pictures through a cellphone. "Nude body pictures, topless, bottomless, poses, inappropriate," said one tenth grader.

Its invaded middle schools as well. A seventh grader said, "It's not usually strangers. It's just somebody you've been talking to lately and they want to see more of you... literally."

Half of the 12 year old's ABC 7/NewsChannel 8's Julie Parker talked to had heard of this happening in their school. All the students talked to for the story said while they knew about it, they hadn't done it themselves. Both genders agree the boys are the instigators, but some girls play along.

"I think the girls, they just want to get their attention and usually it works," said an eighth grader. Another student in the same grade said, "Sometimes they'll say, 'Send me a picture of your boobs' or 'Send me a picture of your butt.'"

The risque game has very real consequences. "The phones these days are like very good so they can just like send it to the Internet and they can put it on MySpace and other people can save it so it's like all over the place," said a seventh grader.

John Shehan from the National Center for Missing & Exploited Children said, "Once it's out there, while they might think it's just their classmates looking at these images, well, it's also the dirty old men. It's the pedophiles. It's those that want to sexually prey on children who take these images, who collect them and spread them worldwide."

It's a very real fear for parents. "It's alarming. They're not protected." "It's really disappointing! It's hard to be a parent today."

The kids said very often it starts as a girlfriend sending a boyfriend a picture, but then they break up, he shows a friend and it quickly gets forwarded around. It's a felony for children under 18 to not only receive one of these pictures on their phone, but taking a photo and sending it could lead to pornography production and distribution charges.
 
Psychologists have also argued that digital technology is changing the way we think. They point out that students no longer need to plan essays before starting to write - thanks to word processors they can edit as they go along.

Stupid argument. Of course they have to, but they probably won't/can't do it so well if we don't teach them how. I think this whole article seems to be based on the assumption that there are no adults around, and and that kids automatically should know how to use the internet and computers in a good way. (if there possibly could be one!)..... ? There is a whole bunch of good stuff coming out of stuff like word processors and interwebs also, but they fail to mention that. Also, I think it's funny that we still say stuff like "real conversations", "real life" - despite it being such a big part of most peoples' lives.
 
A new, dangerous trend is growing among teenagers: text messaging explicit photos of themselves, also known as sexting. Students as young as 12 are exchanging salacious pictures and messages through their cellphones.

Yet another to add to my long list of reasons for me to have multiple jobs to be able to afford sending the children to private school.
 
I generally use Facebook and Myspace as a means to promote my writings and interviews. It also gets me in contact with other people who are either in bands or promotion and distribution types.
 
I can happily say that I've never even seen a facebook page. I've never even begun to type into the browser
 
Also, I think it's funny that we still say stuff like "real conversations", "real life" - despite it being such a big part of most peoples' lives.


I think they are describing conversations such as what is seen on the Nevermore forum.

Idiot 1: I ate pizza today
Idiot 2: Omgzzz lollers did it half peperoni hardy har har


Conversations that lack substance, hence the quotation marks.


Children don't face a curriculum demanding enough to warrant the aid of a computer until high school. A library card can provide all the source material that is necessary, without the need to ask the question a/s/l.