no you didnt say that. all you said is that there's planes that are twice as old that havnt disentigraded yet. that is a vauge statement that can be taken many ways. now you have elaborated and stated what you 'meant' by that original post. i took that post to mean you were saying that if planes dont fall apart, neither should shuttles. you can see why i would think that is a fucking ludacris statment to make. either way, you've now said what you meant, i understand what you're saying, and we both used some big words and tried to sound smart. fuck off.Originally posted by Guerrilla
No dumbass, pay attention here. I said that shuttles aren't built like planes. Their job is to go to space. A plane's job is to just fly around. You don't expect a plane to go to space, while a shuttle is built stronger for that reason. Keeping that in mind, you can compare a shuttle and a plane. Columbia was 20 years old. A 747 can be 35 years old. All I said is that although planes can be much older than those shuttles, and are not inspected nearly as much, they can still do their job for many more years without crashing or anything.
Besides, shuttles were meant to do up to 100 missions before getting replaced by newer shuttles. Columbia was on its 28th mission. Age shouldn't be an issue.
Originally posted by neal
now you have elaborated and stated what you 'meant' by that original post. i took that post to mean you were saying that if planes dont fall apart, neither should shuttles.