The Ozzman
Melted by feels
Vietnam proves that massive military power isn't cool when lots of normal people die
Lmao ok
Vietnam proves that massive military power isn't cool when lots of normal people die
No, I referenced it as something that I noted a long time ago as a major factor. The article goes a lot more in depth, but you don't seem that interested in learning, so you do you.
Lmao ok
Get woke, son
https://warontherocks.com/2019/08/the-myth-of-american-military-dominance/
Been saying this since I spent time in Iraq.
I finally read this and I can't believe how it just ignores logistics in all parts of defining military strength. Attributing Soviet strength to defeating Nazi and Japanese army screams of some RT level spin. Hilarious
Let's ignore the Jewish theater, three front mistake the Nazis made and the colossal mistake the Japanese engaged in both in and around China and against us and simply state Soviet prowess.
Then his argument about a stalemate in Korea when in reality Americans surged past the parallel and stopped at the parallel. When the war started for us in damn Busan. after realizing the limitations of a distant war , yet again, has to wonder why someone so interested in writing about the myth of American military prowess can ignore the "quieter" side of war.
This was a stupid article and should've been rewritten of a thesis that American military strength is backed by a manufacturing dominance rather than some strange military esque myth.
And of course the idea that no one wants to engage a war with us is ignored because ...
Blah
One of the biggest takeaways for the high school students who participated in the war game was that they realized for the first time that they weren’t alone, that there were other young women equally interested in national security.
The bottom line is that the US is a sea-power, not a land power...
The U.S is an air-power, no?
For those reasons, the panel members see a measured way of reinstating the draft as the best option for getting Americans reacquainted with such service that previous generations took as the norm.
“We need to start,” Wilkerson said. “We need to have at least a small bit of conscription.”
The suggested method was laid out in Laich’s book and remains his summarized recommendation.
A national no-deferral lottery system for men and women.
If selected, the person would have the option of three choices — serving two years on active duty following basic training and job training; serving in either the Guard or Reserve for six years after the same training but if deployed for one year or more, service obligation would be considered satisfied; if the selected person wants instead to attend college then they would participate in the Reserve Officer Training Corps and serve a commission. If they fail to gain a commission then they revert to option one or two.
The larger effect, forum members hope, is to engage citizens in how the country uses its military.
Perhaps most importantly, the more methodologically sound approach to comparing defense spending based on PPP illustrates that the gap between U.S. expenditure on the one hand and that of Russia and China on the other has closed dramatically over the past 15 years. Today, when taken together, spending by Russia and China is roughly equal to U.S. defense expenditure, with Russia representing a much larger share than previously recognized.
Not yet. I am past the initial testing and whatnot but still have a few phases to go through prior to that. I'm trying to get promoted at my current job and I'd be making over 100k at that point; its a tough call.
Are you still doing the stock trading shit?
Fuck would you leave that job for then? Fbi SA is like 80k with expected 50+ hours work week and you're likely to get assigned to a shit hole