That's kinda my point...are people really worried that the 'south is gonna rise again' and these oppressed racists are going to win at the voting booths??...brony counter-protesters make fun of how much they outnumber them, yet there they are in public with just as stupid looking outfits, acting equally as stupid...wow...you really showed them. How are rednecks psyching out these violent peace mongers so easily?
The major problem here is the presence of violence, not the voicing of concern. I think you can have the latter without resorting to the former, and I don't think it's misguided to speak out against public displays of bigotry, no matter how small or infrequent.
That's the thing...white supremacists AREN'T a problem. If uneducated wanna-be liberals weren't there ALSO upsetting their community and feeding them attention, there'd be no message to "not tolerate". Jeez man, racist people have ALWAYS existed...yeah...let them have their stupid, narrow minded view. If you're intent is to destroy citizens opinions by singling them out and attacking them (no matter how vile their message), then that also makes you an oppressor. Gearing up to flail around in the street screaming makes the leftists look EQUALLY as stupid. Educated people DO NOT act like that.Speaking for myself, no--that's not the concern.
My concern isn't one of paranoia or fear, but of what I believe to be the moral standard worth pursuing. If the choice is between "white supremacy isn't important, just ignore it" and "white supremacy is a problem, let's deal with it," then I opt for the latter. It doesn't have to do with expecting it to become the next widespread populist movement, but simply with the fact that I believe it's wrong on moral grounds and unethical and irrational on intellectual grounds (I wouldn't force the moral argument on anyone else, but the unethical and illogical valences of white supremacy are standard discourse and don't really bear repeating).
I don't condone violent suppression of white supremacist values, but I do support an organized rally on a Saturday to voice opposition. There's nothing juvenile, invasive, unintelligent or illegal in doing so. It's a choice, just as white supremacists have the choice to assemble.
The major problem here is the presence of violence, not the voicing of concern. I think you can have the latter without resorting to the former, and I don't think it's misguided to speak out against public displays of bigotry, no matter how small or infrequent.
The Aug. 18-21 poll found that 54 percent of adults said Confederate monuments "should remain in all public spaces" while 27 percent said they "should be removed from all public spaces." Another 19 percent said they "don't know."
Responses to the poll were sharply split along racial and party lines, however, with whites and Republicans largely supportive of preservation. Democrats and minorities were more likely to support removal.