HamburgerBoy
Active Member
- Sep 16, 2007
- 15,042
- 4,723
- 113
Fetuses aren't human beings tho.
I doubt you'll agree, but I think Obama would have actually said something substantive and diplomatic. Then again, maybe he simply would've condemned white supremacy. I guess we'll never know.
We can't reduce everything to personal experience lest we get ensnared in the barbs of relativism all over again, which is exactly what modern politics is trying to avoid (well, except for "alternative facts," alas).
I called it a peaceful event because it was, far and away, a peaceful event. I acknowledged the few incidents that occurred for the sake of honesty, but those incidents don't affect my description of the event as a whole.
Funny coming from you, who has perfected that game.
Ron Paul is not a politician, hasn't been for years. And them saying "leave it to the state" does not equate to "I WANT TO LEGALIZE CRACK METH HEROINE ETC" . So yes, technically you still have nothing for me.
Which is really no different from what i was mad about. And Its like you've never actually heard of or seen what these drugs can do for you to say something so ignorant as "ITS NOT GOING TO EFFECT ANYONE ELSE"![]()
Oh I'm sorry, you think they shouldn't be criminals but you also agree that they're criminals. Hmmmm ok.
I know reading is not one of your strong-points, blame it on the bootleg teachers that mommy and daddy hired to home-school you...
..."THROUGH JUNE 15 OF 2016"
Yeah they're giraffes or something.
You said, give me a politician, I did. Now you're saying he didn't say it yesterday so it doesn't count. You've also dismissed the more contemporary Gary Johnson.
Your personal moral outrage with regards to hard drugs doesn't convince me. This is like some religious moralist autistically screeching about immoral influences on the community from music, movies and atheism or something.
Personal liberties shouldn't be banned because it morally outrages people and could potentially hurt people around said individual.
I have no idea how this is confusing you. They're criminals now, just like once upon a time people who sold alcohol were also criminals, now we have liquor stores.
My cum is a human being.
A) Ron Paul isn't a politician and hasn't been one for years. And Gary Johnson was talking about making prescription heroin legal, which already exists and once again showcases why absolute no one takes him seriously(because evidently he rarely knows what he's talking about). The man is an absolute laughingstock out here, which was the only reason i even brought him up ... to have a good laugh at his idiocy. Most libertarians would slap you for even trying to imply that he represents them. Also again, saying the state should decide does not equate to them saying = YES LETS LEGALIZE CRACK, METH ETC. You have a fundamental misunderstanding of what being a libertarian is. Like i said, stick to your boondie aussie politics and go play with your wallabees instead of trying to get your dick hard with our stuff.
Now we're comparing music and movies to what drugs can do to a community? Are you fuckign serious? This just keeps getting better and better. That's honestly so ridiculous that its not even worth responding to. Worst thing youve said in the last 2 days. And dude, you're on the the other side of the world constantly romanticizing about our politics when evidently you dont even know how they work. You're like an australlian bumpkin Trevor Noah. And add to that you are just constantly showcasing just how separated form reality you are for trying to imply LEGALIZING HARD DRUGS IS MY RIGHT! Again, you clearly have not seen what drugs do to A COMMUNITY, not just you in your own fucking house. BUT ITS MY RIGHT TO DO WHAETVERRR I WANNNNTTT. YYAAAYYY IM AN U.S. LIBERTARIANIf you putting dope in my kids hand is your right, then me putting a bullet in your head is my right.
What's confusing me is you keep implying "I DONT THINK THEY ShOULD BE CRIMINALS BUT YES I THINK DRUG DEALERS ARE CLEARLY CRIMINALS". Stop fucking flip-flopping all over the place.That's like me saying "I THINK RAPISTS ARE CRIMINALS BUT I DONT THINK THEY SHOULD BE CRIMINALS"
And again, you are really someone i can have no respect for if you;re truly ignorant enough to imply selling dope only effects the people who use it. What fuckin planet do you live on?
Says you in your response. You are the most reactionary person this board has ever seen bro, as many have already pointed out throughout the years. You will respond to anything i say whenever i say it.endlessly responding.
Your cum needs a woman's egg first, retard.
And a newly conceived zygote requires nine months of nurturing, abo.
Premature births definitely aren't a thing.
Yes, I know it's a huge stretch to compare political donations and taxes when talking about qualitative differences in wealth, even though the qualitative differences apply to both situations. But never mind bothering to follow the logic when you can just cop out with "that's not a legitimate response".So now you go off comparing donations to tax payer dollars?this just keeps getting better and better
Also you do realize that the rich pay the majority of this nations taxes, right? They were probaly the ones thjat put your through public schooling ... so you should thank them for having the mindset you currently have.
Anyway why am i even bothering with you when you havent had a single legitimate response to any of my posts?
... smh. Sad. Truly sad.... smh. Sad. Truly sad.
please dont respond/quote me next time if you are going to ignore 99% of my posts. I'm giving you the credit of guessing you actually understood what i said. Which i'm not so sure about tbh, but whatever,