The News Thread
- Thread starter Jimmy... Dead.
- Start date
crimsonfloyd
Active Member
LOL. If you want to engage in debate with me, your gonna actually have to use reasoning. I never even mentioned Trump until you did. Since when is supporting Trump necessary to be a right wing extremist. There were right wing extremists far before Trump. I'm ignoring the rest of what you said in this chunk, since it was a rant that had nothing to do with what I said. If you're gonna come with that sort of weak shit, debate with CiG instead.
It's literally not terrorism if it's not politically motivated. But I guess the US Code of Laws is Fake News.
And I never said other murder doesn't matter (though it is off topic). You are terrible with inferences.
CiG
Approximately Infinite Universe
You're not as smart, adult or reasoned as you think you are.
Right-wing terrorism was off-topic when you brought it up initially. Bernie Sanders is statistically more likely to be killed by a young black male than a right-wing terrorist.
Last edited:
TechnicalBarbarity
Poser Disposer
lmao, oh okay. Thank you for explaining that to me. The level of ignorance that you're displaying here is beyond belief tbh. I literally told you the same thing you have been putting on repeat in my first post you mentally deficient hippie. The fact that you are still having trouble digesting what i said says a lot. I wont continue this with you until you regenerate some braincells and go back and reread what i wrote.
you cant possibly be this braindead. This is the reason no one here should take you seriously. Do i need to link you to a fucking dictionary that defines what terror, terrorism and terrorist means? Or do you let the government or a politically hijacked and loaded definition of the word define what they actually mean? If i come to your house right now and smash in your windows, set up a barricade and assault everyone and anyone that comes and goes i am literally terrorizing you. The word terror is not married to politics, but i'm amazed that i actually have to explain this to you like you're a fucking 12 year old. TERROR CAN ONLY OCCUR WHEN POLITICS IS INVOLVED how fucking retarded does that sound? BUBUBUT THE US CODE OF LAWS SAYS ..... :LOL: Sorry but i havent adopted the sheep mentality that you have so i dont let the government define words for me that have had definitions that are basically etched in stone. Here is what the actual definition of the words are from a fucking dictionary ....WEBSTERS DICTIONARY ....
Terror
a state of intense fear
Terrorism
the systematic use of terror especially as a means of coercion
Terrorist
an advocate or practitioner of terrorism as a means of coercion
And you keep taking shots at CIG but as much as i dislike the guy, fact of the matter is that he is a fucking genius compared to the likes of you(quite possibly the dumbest person here) and im being completely honest here my man.
CiG
Approximately Infinite Universe
TechnicalBarbarity
Poser Disposer
rms
Active Member
Einherjar86
Active Member
Not well over half, I was mistaken. But a significant percentage have opted to stay in Mexico.
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-...n-in-spite-of-mexico-jobs-offer-idUSKCN1N10Q8
CiG
Approximately Infinite Universe
rms
Active Member
Dak
mentat
Why head north to the US when a socialist Utopia is much closer to the south and speaks the same language?
rms
Active Member
arg
Active Member
- Jun 4, 2008
- 5,746
- 1,442
- 113
Criteria for asylum acceptance according to current law
Poverty? NOPE
Gang violence? NOPE
Domestic violence? NOPE
(Any other sob story NOT one of the below 3) NOPE
Natural disaster? Did it really happen and is it severe enough? If yes, ok but temporary. If not, NOPE
Religious persecution? NEED CONCRETE PROOF. If you have that, ok but temporary. If not, NOPE
Political persecution? NEED CONCRETE PROOF. If you have that, ok but temporary. If not, NOPE.
...that is how it should be enforced, but it isn’t. Many are let in based on sob stories, lies, and without sufficient proof.
Poverty? NOPE
Gang violence? NOPE
Domestic violence? NOPE
(Any other sob story NOT one of the below 3) NOPE
Natural disaster? Did it really happen and is it severe enough? If yes, ok but temporary. If not, NOPE
Religious persecution? NEED CONCRETE PROOF. If you have that, ok but temporary. If not, NOPE
Political persecution? NEED CONCRETE PROOF. If you have that, ok but temporary. If not, NOPE.
...that is how it should be enforced, but it isn’t. Many are let in based on sob stories, lies, and without sufficient proof.
Last edited:
CiG
Approximately Infinite Universe
TechnicalBarbarity
Poser Disposer
RABID LIBERALS
... lmfao
MOAR RABID LIBERALS, BUT ONES IN SUITS ...
In 2017, Dr. Snipes admitted in court that her office had allowed non-citizens and felons to vote and was particularly vulnerable ahead of major elections.
In 2012, a Broward elections official complained about Snipes tendency to “find” additional ballots in close elections. Ilene Lieberman, a Broward County Commissioner and Canvassing board member, told the Miami CBS affiliate in 2012, “When the canvassing board recessed on Saturday we were basically told there were between 150 and 165 ballots remained to be counted, that they had to double check, that they hadn’t been counted before. And when we came back on Monday the report showed 963 new ballots.”
Snipes also presided over a “phantom voting district” of 2000 voters who were using illegal addresses, many of them at a UPS Store, claimed as their places of residence.
Republican Party officials sued Snipes’ office in 2016 over the illegal counting of 180,000 mail in ballots, she admitted that she didn’t know the meaning of the word “canvassing.” Snipes’ office had been opening ballots illegally, without the legally required participation of other members of the canvasing board.
and these are the people that some of you are supporting?
... lmfao
MOAR RABID LIBERALS, BUT ONES IN SUITS ...
In 2017, Dr. Snipes admitted in court that her office had allowed non-citizens and felons to vote and was particularly vulnerable ahead of major elections.
In 2012, a Broward elections official complained about Snipes tendency to “find” additional ballots in close elections. Ilene Lieberman, a Broward County Commissioner and Canvassing board member, told the Miami CBS affiliate in 2012, “When the canvassing board recessed on Saturday we were basically told there were between 150 and 165 ballots remained to be counted, that they had to double check, that they hadn’t been counted before. And when we came back on Monday the report showed 963 new ballots.”
Snipes also presided over a “phantom voting district” of 2000 voters who were using illegal addresses, many of them at a UPS Store, claimed as their places of residence.
Republican Party officials sued Snipes’ office in 2016 over the illegal counting of 180,000 mail in ballots, she admitted that she didn’t know the meaning of the word “canvassing.” Snipes’ office had been opening ballots illegally, without the legally required participation of other members of the canvasing board.
and these are the people that some of you are supporting?
Satanstoenail
My Larpstyle determines my Derpstyle
Glad this fuckhead didn’t take more people out. Apparently his plan was to run down as many people as possible and explode a bunch of gas bottles in the tray of his ute while he ran around stabbing people.
My wife was supposed to be in the city when it happened but changed her mind thank fuck.
CiG
Approximately Infinite Universe
That's two close calls for GMD members in the last couple of days. What the fuck man, being a hermit or doing all your shopping online is more and more having its perks.
crimsonfloyd
Active Member
WEBSTERS DICTIONARY ....
Terror
a state of intense fear
Terrorism
the systematic use of terror especially as a means of coercion
Terrorist
an advocate or practitioner of terrorism as a means of coercion
And you keep taking shots at CIG but as much as i dislike the guy, fact of the matter is that he is a fucking genius compared to the likes of you(quite possibly the dumbest person here) and im being completely honest here my man.
This is like playing chess with a checkers player. I reference US law and you reference the dictionary. Obviously, terrorism has colloquial meanings, but the legal defintion is the one that actually matters in determining what is and is not terrorism. And that definition specifically identifies terrorism as political violence against noncombatants.
Last edited:
Similar threads
