The News Thread

Oh. Well my initial shock about the police was from the clip of them moving a barrier, which you informed me wasn't entirely accurate. My general sense of the police was that they were simply unprepared, which was my original comment to you in this thread, if I recall.

As far as the role Sullivan played, I gotta disagree. I don't see how bringing a knife or negotiating with cops changes anything. Other rioters brought firearms, explosives, and zip ties. A knife is small potatoes. Remove him from the scenario, it's almost certain we'd have seen the same events play out.

If I unlike it can I not watch it? :D
 
He's pleading with the cops to move and let everybody through, and moments later they're smashing the door and that dipshit female veteran gets shot climbing through it. I'd say that's playing a significant role in getting police to move away from the door.

Sounding like some partisan cope from you tbh.
 
Cheers I'm watching this now. Based on your TLDW explanation yeah this is what I've already assumed and basically outright said; AntiFa activists have a habit of going to protests to cause chaos, if you followed any amount of livestreams during the Floyd protests a shitload of black people were directly calling them out. Look at what happened with CHAZ, it's what these people do. It's online anarchism made reality.

Going around causing chaos at protests doesn't make you a fake leftist though, anymore more than Viking man at the Capitol riot is a fake right-winger because he has been seen at climate protests.

Yeah I’m not saying he’s not a leftist. Some anarchists are very utopian, others are total nihilists and just want to “accelerate the collapse.” That’s the vibe I get from him, since he’s constantly going places and fucking shit up.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CiG
So now I'm at the part where Blumenthal outlines how this guy played significant roles in instigating violence and destruction at BLM protests. This is definitely his thing.

Yeah I’m not saying he’s not a leftist. Some anarchists are very utopian, others are total nihilists and just want to “accelerate the collapse.” That’s the vibe I get from him, since he’s constantly going places and fucking shit up.

Yeah accelerating the collapse is what I should have said, haha. Isn't there a specific term for that? I think the idea is that some kind of revolution will come from the chaos if it gets bad enough.

To be fair, the information Blumenthal is laying down makes him sound pretty uniquely fucking toxic, like way worse than your garden variety anarchist activist or whatever. This guy is apparently blacklisted by a shitload of BLM chapters across the country for being too much of a bad presence, noting that arrest rates always increased whenever he got involved.
 
He's pleading with the cops to move and let everybody through, and moments later they're smashing the door and that dipshit female veteran gets shot climbing through it. I'd say that's playing a significant role in getting police to move away from the door.

Sounding like some partisan cope from you tbh.

Haha, wat. How do we arrive at these moments?

You already said you don’t think it was anything but a right-wing riot. I’m saying that Sullivan’s presence doesn’t change that. This was a riot primarily instigated by the president, and in some cases premeditated by right-wing rioters who came with guns.

That Sullivan had a knife and got swept up in the bullshit isn’t a sign of anything other than that he’s a solitary chaos actor. It doesn’t change the dynamics of the event by any meaningful standard.

"PolitiFact did this fact check seeking to minimize his role which was just a lie, PolitiFact should retract its fact check." - Blumenthal

No, it shouldn’t. His role was minimal. The footage on his phone is one perspective among thousands. We can’t jump to the conclusion that it was the determinative element within the mass.
 
He didn't just "have a knife" he was offering it to the people trying to break in, to use as some kind of tool (like a screwdriver or something to crack a window).

See this is why your comments are a bit worthless, no offence, but you just haven't watched or read anything other than the initial wave of hot takes. I'm not saying he was a catalyst or a determinative element just that his presence had significance (which the evidence Blumenthal lays out demonstrates imo).

The reason I'm saying you're coming off as a coping partisan is because you're so desperate to dismiss counter-information that you're doing it without actually seeing/reading it. :lol:
 
What kind of significance are you talking about? Because I feel like you’re saying something different than I am.

I’m saying that if you removed Sullivan from the situation, the overall effect would have been the same. I’m not denying he participated and did shit. But that’s different than substantiating his role to the point that the right can latch onto it as evidence that the left perpetrated the riot.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CiG
Yeah I'm definitely not saying that, if you recall my first comment was just that it's interesting that people who even claim he was part of the riot get fact checked and flagged as false information.

His significance is that in all the video footage available out there, he's one of the loudest and most constant voices of incitement at the riot. He himself engaged in very little rioting, he broke a window or something but that's it. If you have a single individual of any stripe at any protest/riot and they're spouting a message of "burn this shit down" to damn near every single person they interact with, and they tell cops who are extremely outnumbered "we want you to make it home, just let them through" moments before the mob breaks down a door, that's noteworthy in any context as far as I'm concerned.

This guy apparently has a history of doing this kind of shit. If a place is on fire, it will burn down, that doesn't mean the guy running around dumping gasoline on it is insignificant.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Einherjar86
https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/executive-order-revocation-executive-order-13770/

Revoked his own executive order which had banned post-administration lobbying for 5 years, on his last day of office. He really needs that money. :lol:

Not sure if he's a bigger fraud than Clinton/W/Obama yet, but he's certainly well on-par. His last-day pardons are a disgrace too; Obama's commutation of Manning was cringe in that it was engineered for the purpose of sucking off the trans crowd, but at least there was a commutation. I'm actually feeling cautiously optimistic about a Biden administration now, even though the police state will undoubtedly reach record new powers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: zabu of nΩd
Yeah a lot of his supporters seem pretty pissed right now. I'm reading murmurings of an Ivanka Trump Governor of Florida run which would be amazingly terrible, and if he tries reinventing himself as some kind of centrist pardoner-of-celebrities-and-millionaires for 2024, I could actually see his base crumbling and failing to get the nomination (unless he runs third-party and guarantees as Rep loss). I mean, fucking Mitt Romney of all people is now grilling Biden's cabinet nominees over the incoming immigrant caravan, and Trump has said jack shit on his main 2016 platform basically ever since the wuflu hit. If Trump gets socially/culturally out-righted by a neoliberal "principled conservative" former Massachusetts Governor, he's toast.

EDIT: Oh and I saw that Tom Cotton held up the nomination of Avril Haines temporarily until she answered a question to his satisfaction. When I first read the story on CNN it was difficult to even figure out exactly what the full context was, seeming odd that Tom Cotton (a relatively junior Senator) would be talking about investigations around CIA waterboarding from the 00s. Then I realized that the entire media was, in the most poker-faced way possible, essentially saying that Cotton forced her to commit to not pursuing criminal investigations of the obviously illegal act of torturing, trying to make Cotton look like the good guy for the sake of incoming Avril Haines who had just given him the thumbs up. :lol:

Waterboarding/Guantanamo/etc was never really my big schtick to begin with so it's not like I'm personally outraged, but it shows first and foremost that the priority is always in the state protecting its own, and secondly how shallow Biden's commitment to any real progressive causes will be. But hey there's a deadly virus and an insurrection going on, we can't afford to wait. :lol: Anyone thinking these next four years are going to be boring is crazy.

What a 180 from you

I dunno, more like a 45 at most. I've never thought Trump was particularly honest except in the "He blurts out whatever he's thinking at the moment" kind of way, but I didn't expect him to so blatantly shit on his own MAGAtards regarding draining the swamp. Based on what I know of Lil Wayne's pardon I actually support it, and I get the pandering intent to it, but pardoning a bunch of ultra-millionaire fraud scumbags and an ultra-corrupt Democratic mayor over any number of other candidates is just insult to injury.
 
Last edited:
Yeah, over the privately-funded wall scheme. When the charges first dropped I gave Bannon the benefit of the doubt that some money was moved illegally on a technicality, but Bannon's own response looked sus as fuck, and ultimately if true, it means Trump pardoned Bannon for selling a fraudulent private border wall scheme to Trump supporters who were tired of waiting for Trump's vaporware public border wall scheme. Makes it sound almost like Trump might bring him back into the fold for 2024. Or maybe Bannon just has dirt on Trump.