zabu of nΩd
Free Insultation
- Feb 9, 2007
- 14,620
- 795
- 113
It's true. I get that personal finance is a casual topic for many, but because it's such a horrendously misunderstood topic, and something where uninformed decisions routinely cost people years of unnecessary servitude in the rat race, I feel an obligation to educate people.lmao you're clearly emotional about this particular issue for some reason.
I see you're at least starting to acknowledge the merits of the stock market in aggregate, but it looks like you're still straining to draw this false equivalency with cryptos by harping on these issues (i.e. speculative stocks, and the number of companies that go out of business) that I've already shown don't matter at the aggregate level.I didn't say all crypto and I'm not speaking categorically, I said "a single (non-shit) business stock vs a single (non-shit) cryptocurrency". Meaning, throw away penny stock scams, throw away shitcoin scams, take a gamble on a single longer-shot like GME vs a contemporary crypto fad. I'm not talking about buying an index fund or a hypothetical average.
Many stocks (including most with the greatest growth potential) don't offer dividends at all. Most companies "will be obsolete one day" too, which low-tier currently-hyper-speculative brick & mortars like GME and BBBY illustrate nicely. Oil companies (which do offer pretty strong dividends usually) could very well take a massive shit in a couple decades when you have GM promising to make their entire fleet electric by 2035. While I agree that bitcoin's realized value is primarily speculative, so is that of many physical assets such as gold and collectibles, which obviously doesn't in and of itself doesn't imply complete lack of value. Any Argentinian facing steady unending inflation of his dollar will find value in buying something with inherent scarcity, for example.
The rest of your post seems to be agreeing with what I said in my initial post which you dismissed as "irrelevant logic".
Yes, a lot of stocks don't pay dividends. That doesn't prove those stocks are worthless. Many companies (i.e. Apple) wait until their rapid growth phase is over to start paying a dividend, because they can grow faster initially by holding on to the excess cash and reinvesting it. If you're really that much of a conspiracy theorist about companies that don't pay dividends, you can always invest in a "high yield" index fund that screens stocks by dividend yield. You'll miss out on all the game-changing tech companies, but the market will still "work" under that prerequisite.
I'm actually a believer in gold. Like cryptos, it's not something that gains value by nature (and thus I'll probably never own nearly as much gold as stock), but it can at least hold value after inflation. The value of gold is mostly psychological, but not entirely, since it has some industrial uses. It also has a far "stickier" psychological value than cryptos, because it's been a major currency throughout human history, and it's ingrained in the world's institutions in a way that cryptos aren't (it amuses me how many people who gripe about central banks manipulating the gold market with their reserves overlook the very fact of them having gold reserves to begin with, which is a vote of confidence in gold's value). It's also something you can hold in physical form, so the government can't just "pull the plug" on your savings like they can with cryptos.
Last edited: