The News Thread
- Thread starter Jimmy... Dead.
- Start date
rms
Active Member
TechnicalBarbarity
Poser Disposer
so Dwayne Wades 12 year old son came out as a trannie a few days ago and now Snoops son comes out? 
Smh. Perfect examples of why this is the last state anyone should be raising a family in.
Smh. Perfect examples of why this is the last state anyone should be raising a family in.
Einherjar86
Active Member
CiG
Approximately Infinite Universe
Why does transgenderism among 12 year olds make you comfortable?
HamburgerBoy
Active Member
- Sep 16, 2007
- 15,042
- 4,723
- 113
iirc Snoop Dogg was vocal and angry about Louis Farrakhan being deplatformed; someone must have put chemicals in his son's water supply as revenge.
EDIT: Is it confirmed he's gay or is he just doing some weird fashion thing? The photos make him look like he's trying to be Prince (who was technically still 100% hetero afaik).
EDIT: Is it confirmed he's gay or is he just doing some weird fashion thing? The photos make him look like he's trying to be Prince (who was technically still 100% hetero afaik).
Einherjar86
Active Member
TechnicalBarbarity
Poser Disposer
CiG
Approximately Infinite Universe
It freaks you out? You must have no life or something.
TechnicalBarbarity
Poser Disposer
no way dude, we should give zero fucks about what's going on with the youth of our country, especially when they're from the same fucking city and state some of us are trying to raise our families in(is this where i roll my eyes like a little bitch?). The amount if blind ignorance some of these rabid progtards display on a regular basis is mind-blowing tbh.
CiG
Approximately Infinite Universe
Didn't Prince come out against gay marriage or some shit? Weird dude, I always thought he was bisexual.
TechnicalBarbarity
Poser Disposer
Einherjar86
Active Member
TechnicalBarbarity
Poser Disposer
damn you got me!
what a square
funniest part is the last few times we interacted(including today) was because you actually responded to my posts .... which had nothing to do with you. Sooooo yeah.
what a squarefunniest part is the last few times we interacted(including today) was because you actually responded to my posts .... which had nothing to do with you. Sooooo yeah.
CiG
Approximately Infinite Universe
He insults you and says you're not worth responding to constantly, and then he totally drops his discussion with me to sling shit with you. What a dramawhore.
Well, TB’s obsession with responding to all my posts (photoshops and all) strikes me as more time-consuming than having a reaction to your bigotry.
Feelz come easier to cucks like you I guess.
Anyway CNN doing what CNN does; smearing people. This time the journalist who dug up and leaked the Bloomberg audio about stop-and-frisk:
I love this idea that it's old audio and Bloomberg has changed, he's seen the light, at the time he didn't understand the negative impacts blah blah blah. It was from fucking 2015.
HamburgerBoy
Active Member
- Sep 16, 2007
- 15,042
- 4,723
- 113
Trump made a Twitter post about the Bloomberg audio and then deleted it quickly; I'm guessing it wasn't because he was afraid of being called a racist himself (since most of the media calls him one) but because he wants it in reserve in case Bloomberg becomes the nominee. I'll laugh so fucking hard if Bloomberg is really the best the DNC can do for 2020.
Don't know about his political views, but he became Jehova's Witness at some point, and they tend to be a little on the crazy side (see also: Ben Carson). iirc he actually stopped playing a fair chunk of his earlier discography for religious reasons, though I think he always kept had his effeminate fashion sense.
Don't know about his political views, but he became Jehova's Witness at some point, and they tend to be a little on the crazy side (see also: Ben Carson). iirc he actually stopped playing a fair chunk of his earlier discography for religious reasons, though I think he always kept had his effeminate fashion sense.
Einherjar86
Active Member
CiG
Approximately Infinite Universe
Well, that’s because you made reference to something I said during an earlier conversation; so I thought it was appropriate to do so as well.
Come on guys, keep up.
Einherjar86
Active Member
Did either of you even read that study cited by the Daily Wire? Did you compare the language of the article with the language of the study?
For starters, the study isn’t about liberal bias across the media but about specifically financial journalists working with large financial industries. It does state that about 50% of all financial journalists claim to “lean left,” with about 30% moderate and the remaining conservative. But the study doesn’t say that these ideological affiliations bias their reporting; of anything, it claims that desire to maintain access to industry insiders biases them to publish positive stories.
Second, I don’t think it’s a massive revelation that lots of journalists outside of financial reporting “lean left”; but that doesn’t translate into media bias at the scale of corporate power and communications. News conglomerates are companies, and they have no financial interest in promoting left-wing economic values or models. Although certain journalists evince political biases, that doesn’t mean these translate into deep-seeded left-wing bias with media corporations themselves.
Finally, the Rasmussen polls aren’t actually about journalists’ biases but about what voters perceive as media bias. As I think is clear based on some of the posts here, bias and facts aren’t mutually exclusive; one can present facts in a biased manner. The Daily Wire article is an example of facts presented in a biased manner.
For starters, the study isn’t about liberal bias across the media but about specifically financial journalists working with large financial industries. It does state that about 50% of all financial journalists claim to “lean left,” with about 30% moderate and the remaining conservative. But the study doesn’t say that these ideological affiliations bias their reporting; of anything, it claims that desire to maintain access to industry insiders biases them to publish positive stories.
Second, I don’t think it’s a massive revelation that lots of journalists outside of financial reporting “lean left”; but that doesn’t translate into media bias at the scale of corporate power and communications. News conglomerates are companies, and they have no financial interest in promoting left-wing economic values or models. Although certain journalists evince political biases, that doesn’t mean these translate into deep-seeded left-wing bias with media corporations themselves.
Finally, the Rasmussen polls aren’t actually about journalists’ biases but about what voters perceive as media bias. As I think is clear based on some of the posts here, bias and facts aren’t mutually exclusive; one can present facts in a biased manner. The Daily Wire article is an example of facts presented in a biased manner.
Last edited:
CiG
Approximately Infinite Universe
Apparently Bloomberg has spent more money in < 3 months than Hillary Clinton spent on her entire general election campaign.
