The non-argument "Can you do it better?"

^
Sorry bro but I'm going to have to disagree.

I was given Fruity Loops 7.0 and decided to mess about with it. Within a few hours I was able to create respectable beats with little knowledge of what the program entailed or any in-depth knowledge of electronic music.

I showed it to friends and they were impressed at what was achieved so I let them mess about with it. Needless to say, even the less than musically gifted friends were able to create catchy tunes in the genre.

Moving on to rock and metal or any other live instrument orientated genre. I fail to see how you can create or be eligible to join a band to create a rock or metal song after a few hours of messing about. I've been playing drums for 6 years and still am not happy with my abilities to play professionally.

The ratio of knowledge and time to grasp the concepts of rock and electronic music are to be considered.

A basic trance/electro song is so easy to comprehend structure-wise it's almost a joke on the senses. Basic rock songs too fall into this droning, linear structure which also requires no musical artistry to understand the formula involved.

However, progressive rock or metal compared to electro, house and techno?

Whilst electronic music only requires the grasping of a MIDI keyboard to initially get started, to learn an instrument to play metal or rock is a different matter unless you're some virtuoso.

In my Audio course I had to create a song with certain criteria to be followed. I decided to create a progressive trance song. Damn right, it took me over 60 hours to get the hang of it whilst it wouldn't take me that long to formulate a decent rock song.

I'd like to compare the two like this, although I might be off so please be free to harshly criticise this comparison...

Rock, jazz, metal, funk, classical music etc etc which involves the cohesion of live human beings and the technical mastery of a tangible instrument could be compared to painting a portrait using a canvas, paints, brushes etc etc. in my eyes.

On the other hand, electronic music could be compared to digital art.

I'm not disparaging either, mind you, both take discipline, dedication and skill to get good at, however I don't feel that electronic music requires the SAME amount of musical flair as music played with instruments if you were to produce a piece on the same level (theoretically speaking of course).

Is my comparison inaccurate? Maybe its just be but from what I've witnessed, it has been much, much, much easier for my friends and I to create electronic pieces than a decent rock song....requiring much less effort and musical mastery...and none of us even own a MIDI keyboard or utilised any external gear. Now you might tell me that the material I produced could be shit in truth, fair enough. But through a mini-survey I carried out a clear result has been drawn where it is much easier to create a, let me say, semi-professional sounding piece of electronic music than it is to create its counterpart with live instruments.
 
If you go through life with high expectations, you're going to be disappointed an awful lot. I'm guessing those that didn't like the Watchmen movie disliked it because it wasn't what they expected it to be.... I'd rather ignore the hype & try not to make up my mind about a film before seeing it..... in most cases this can be a very satisfying experience, and occasionally, thrilling. I can think of several films that caught me completely off guard & proceeded to blow my mind.



So the question shouldn't be, "Could you do better?" but, "What the hell were you expecting?"
 
Hmmm....

But what if I were to buy a film or an album directed/recorded or mixed by someone who has set the standard high? Would it be wrong to expect the delivery which has been made a standard by this person?

If I were to buy an album by someone (for example) like Andy Sneap, I would expect it to contain certain definite elements which are 'trademark' with his name.

If the bone-crushing tone usually captured is replaced with a fizzy/popping sound in its stead, don't I have the right to speculate about what went wrong?

A great football/soccer team are winning every game in the season and they come up against the worst team....I'm obviously going to expect at LEAST relative ease.

But if the winning team concedes an embarrassing defeat, you cannot blame the fans and ask them "What were you expecting?" because the answer needn't be spoken. Of course the fans were expecting the team to maintain their record and not belly-flop suddenly. "Can you do better?" No. But I do expect that if you are claiming professionalism, at least explain yourself for the sudden mediocrity shown, which could be a sign of laziness or apathy.