The official "Who's moving to PT9" thread
- Thread starter [UEAK]Clowd
- Start date
JeffTD
Senhor Testiculo
I'll be getting it and can see myself slowly moving over for a lot of stuff, but at the end of the day it lacks drum maps and slip editing still, which really kills things for me.
Mikaël-ange
Member
- Nov 7, 2008
- 2,368
- 1
- 36
JeffTD
Senhor Testiculo
guitarguru777
Member
Öwen;9480676 said:
My point in all of this being that if you do any collaborative work with any studio that uses Pro Tools its much easier to say send me your session then. Oh export me a bunch of wav files and zip them.
$599 is a small price to pay for that convenience.
JeffTD
Senhor Testiculo
I wonder how the advertised OMF support works in PT9? I always remember it being pure shit between any other DAW, but who knows it would work now?
Williamn
Member
For now im staying with cubase.
Im not buying into the whole PT hype and no way im doing any big studio work/collabs any time soon and I feel "at home" with cubase right now.
but then again I have only tried cubase so far.. so who knows, I might try PT someday and wonder why the fuck I dident do that sooner
Im not buying into the whole PT hype and no way im doing any big studio work/collabs any time soon and I feel "at home" with cubase right now.
but then again I have only tried cubase so far.. so who knows, I might try PT someday and wonder why the fuck I dident do that sooner
Mikaël-ange
Member
- Nov 7, 2008
- 2,368
- 1
- 36
Loren Littlejohn
Lover of all boobage.
So, I'm sort of going to have to take back my vote. I'm probably just going to stick with cubase. Will I upgrade PT8MP? Yeah probably. Will I switch completely though? Probably not.
avrinder
Member
tempe
Captain Midnight
I'm jumping ship for a couple of reasons, I'm happy with logic but even at the small scale of work and clients that I get. I have lost business due to not having pro tools. Which I know is completely stupid but rather than educating the masses I figure I may as well bite the bullet and deal with it. My other reason is that, I'm still at SAE and everything we have to do there is Pro Tools, so I'm using it every day anyway and know my way around it. I'd like to just have to deal with one DAW and not have to worry about transferring projects to Logic so I can edit at home. My final reason is I simply prefer the workflow and editing, Flex time annoys me after I got familiar with beat detective and tab to transient editing.
All in all I can't wait to upgrade!
All in all I can't wait to upgrade!
Danny Drama
Member
- Jun 30, 2010
- 192
- 0
- 16
After trying it for a couple days I can safely say I'll be sticking with Logic 9 as my main Daw. Perhaps if I bought the toolkit and played around again I'd sing a different tune, but for now, it's one of those nice to have it just incase type situations. For now anyways.
MetalJonesy
more metal, more booze!!!
I will be buying 9. Upgrading from 8, I am excited to trash my damn M-Box, that thing sounds like poo and I can seem to only get it to work with PT.
I need it for compatibility and I am stoked I can use my regular interface.
But as my main DAW, I still prefer Cubase:
Drum map
Arranger Track
Score Editing and Export
Slip Editing
Control Room
Track Presets
If Cubase just had Tab to Transient and group editing, I would be pretty happy.
I need it for compatibility and I am stoked I can use my regular interface.
But as my main DAW, I still prefer Cubase:
Drum map
Arranger Track
Score Editing and Export
Slip Editing
Control Room
Track Presets
If Cubase just had Tab to Transient and group editing, I would be pretty happy.
I'm in no way working with big studios, but when I tracked my band's drum tracks in PT HD and then did the rest at my house with Cubase, it was ridiculously easy to move the wav files from PT to Cubase. In no way was the move from one DAW to another EVER a stumbling block. If it's this easy for rinky dink studios, how could it be any harder for large studios?
If I was recording other bands i would do it in a second. But I just muck around for myself at home theses days and Ableton Live is the easiest and funnest way for me.. I have reaper If i want to do serious edits. I do have an old Sonar License laying around and would probably try an x1 upgrade first..
I guess I'm kinda putting my foot in my mouth here, but...
after watching a bunch of videos and talking to a few people, I'm thinking I might pick up PT9 for some editing. I can't see myself recording or mixing in it(especially with the crippled ADC and automation), but it seems like this could increase my editing speed(and quality) by at least a little bit. plus I'll be able to open protools projects from other studios, and so on.
I could be a guinea pig for anyone here that is thinking about switching over? I could test things for people, take screenshots, etc...
after watching a bunch of videos and talking to a few people, I'm thinking I might pick up PT9 for some editing. I can't see myself recording or mixing in it(especially with the crippled ADC and automation), but it seems like this could increase my editing speed(and quality) by at least a little bit. plus I'll be able to open protools projects from other studios, and so on.
I could be a guinea pig for anyone here that is thinking about switching over? I could test things for people, take screenshots, etc...
Jarkko Mattheiszen
The FU guy.
Yup. That's how it always starts.
haha we'll see. like I said, I want protools to be my all-in-one solution but I just don't see how it can be in the state it is in. we'll see what happens. I'm definitely gonna put it through the paces.
