The pics thread

Didn't feel like mentioning that your source is Chairman Pai himself? I guess you figured I wouldn't trust his words very far. You'd be right. The only actual statistic he cites to support his claim that this has been bad for consumers, is that broadband network investment has declined, which is naturally going to happen as coverage increases.

As for the Net Neutrality rules passed in 2015; my understanding is that it went something like this; when the internet was emerging, it was implicitly assumed that ISPs were subject to common carrier rules. Since this was before video streaming became a big thing, there weren't vast differences in bandwidth usage. It wasn't until much later (I believe this was in part in response to rumors that ISPs had already started throttling certain kinds of internet usage) that the net neutrality conversation began in earnest. The FCC released a proposal to explicitly allow fast and slow lanes and it was met with universal criticism. So instead they passed a law to protect internet services under Title II. The takeaway being this; the reason the internet worked before 2015 was because net neutrality was implicit and ISPs weren't actively trying to subvert it.

Some reading
 
  • Like
Reactions: CiG
Didn't feel like mentioning that your source is Chairman Pai himself? I

It's not but the moment I posted the site you wouldn't have given any of it credence anyway. Thanks for at least posting something that gives me an understanding of what is at stake. I still don't believe anything material will happen and if it does then Congress will inevitably intervene and set it back to how it was.
 
Taco-eating Latina porn: Additional $5 charge
Big black booty porn: another $5
Teen girl fucked by huge black dude: another $5 charge

Christ, I'm just trying to shoot a fucking load into a paper towel. Actually buying a prostitute and having her suck me off is going to be the better plan here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: arg and CiG
Taco-eating Latina porn: Additional $5 charge
Big black booty porn: another $5
Teen girl fucked by huge black dude: another $5 charge

Christ, I'm just trying to shoot a fucking load into a paper towel. Actually buying a prostitute and having her suck me off is going to be the better plan here.

Honestly if porn had an extra charge tacked on I would just stop watching tbh.
 
Best excuse ever for not linking to a source.

Let me guess, the same tabloid where you read about the "bogus" results of DNA testing companies?

Prove it's bogus

The link is in my work email which I don't have access to right now. I'd be more than happy to send it to you on Monday when I log in (but you probably don't fucking give a shit anyway so why even ask?)
 
Last edited:
12079332_10153019422212260_5079033372727811372_n.jpg
 
Prove it's bogus
Assuming you mean "prove it's not bogus", that's like saying "prove 9/11 wasn't an inside job". Bullshit conspiracy theories are designed to be undisprovable.

The link is in my work email which I don't have access to right now. I'd be more than happy to send it to you on Monday when I log in (but you probably don't fucking give a shit anyway so why even ask?)
I don't give a shit, just pointing out how absurd your original excuse was.