The real reason Metallica had a beef with Napster

Edward Yawn

New Metal Member
Sep 14, 2005
221
0
0
Under your bed
An old article by Maddox from April 2002 but still a good read:

"Everyone agrees that Metallica's last two albums were dog shit. Even Metallica indirectly admit to it during an interview when they said something to the effect of "our last two albums were shit straight from a dog's ass." In fact, everything the music industry has barfed up lately has been hokey, cookie-cutter, tired, disingenuous garbage. Music on the radio these days can best be summed up as aural pollution.

So while I was watching a movie preview that was saturated with music propaganda the other day, I wondered why Metallica's slide in record sales and popularity coincided with their much publicized attack on Napster. Does it have anything to do with the fact that their albums just plain suck and it's a convenient excuse for them to blame this slump on internet file sharing? Is it a coincidence that the music industry's unrelenting streak of crappy music comes at a time of extremely poor record sales?

Is internet radio to blame, or dumbass executives at Virgin Records signing Mariah Carey for $80 million in 2001, only to give her an extra $28 million to leave just a year later? Why don't they spend that money on innovating rather than trying to sell the crap that's already out there? I'll tell you why. Because they have their heads so far up their asses that they need to have it pried free with a jack hammer."
- Maddox

http://www.thebestpageintheuniverse.net/c.cgi?u=metallica
 
Here fucking go again. This is the biggest Internet forum cliche of all time.

"Everyone agrees that Metallica's last two albums were dog shit" :zombie:
 
LORD_GALVATRON said:
It was at this point that this post lost any credibility.

Even if you dance naked on your head Metallica's music will still be dog shit.

Maddox writes alot of satire but this particular piece is more true than anything you will hear out of George Bush's mouth.
 
Edward Yawn said:

Even if you dance naked on your head Metallica's music will still be dog shit.

Maddox writes alot of satire but this particular piece is more true than anything you will hear out of George Bush's mouth.
:zzz:
 
Listen, I'll make this short:

99% of all posts, hell, ANY comments saying that "Metallica Sucks" are stupid, lame, and never go anywhere. They just say "Load!", "Reload!", or "St. Anger!" to prove their point, and they never realize how dumb it sounds. The band had the balls to do what they wanted WHEN they wanted with their sound.

These threads should be relegatd to messeage boards where tennie-boppers, senior citizens, and rappers hang out. Why? Because they are the one's who can say it and no one cares.
 
Edward Yawn said:

Do I look like I care? Seriously, do you think I would care if you wore a book on your head at a horse race?
[/]



Whatever man, like you wouldn't be stairing like the rest of us
 
Edward Yawn said:
Remember: if you are a metal fan, Metallica owns your skull. The members of Metallica are prophets of Heavy Metal.

:err:

That, after you wrote:

Even if you dance naked on your head Metallica's music will still be dog shit.

Just.... seriously, just go. I'm trying not to write something mean, and it's really hard. Seriously, just go. Leave the lame Metallica crap for the Megadeth boards, where they seem to love to jerk off to "Metallica Sucks" arguments. I came here to get away from that shit. Please, just... go.
 
I'm gonna play devil's advocate for just a minute - let's leave Metallica out of the picture for this one.

We live in an age where some of the most influential bands couldn't get even a piss-poor record contract because the "suits" in the Big Five labels wouldn't be able to see how such bands could turn a massive profit in one album. Artists like Led Zeppelin, Deep Purple, Black Sabbath, and Frank Zappa would never have been able to get off the ground if the 2005-era music industry were around in the late '60s/early '70s.

We live in an age where we are force-fed the next pre-packaged crap circa "American Idol," and artists are treated as commodities, while bands who put out real music are often left languishing either as bar bands or on tiny labels who believe in the music but don't have the mega-bucks to shell out to get the music on Clear Channel/Infinity radio stations.

Look at it this way: William Hung, that no-talent "American Idol" reject hack, not only has a fucking recording contract, but has put out three albums. Makes me want to stick my head in the oven.

My whole point: the industry was too quick to blame innovations such as file-sharing for killing an industry that they had performed an O.J. Simpson on themselves. It's just easier to affix blame (aka file-sharing) than try to fix what may well be broken beyond repair.

Okay, my two minutes is up now. Cue the theme music: Coo, loo-coo-coo-coo-coo-coo-cooooooo!