Slammed
Active Member
- Jun 15, 2017
- 31,889
- 45,435
- 113
Very interesting article. Thanks for sharing it.
I used to be one of the BIGGEST Flots fans in the world, but I can tell you a lot of reasons they never made it, starting with their band name.
Trying to compete with Death Angel and Testament is probably why they opted for that by-the-numbers triggered bass drum tone.
I don't know that the band name has a great deal to do with it. People said The Beatles was a stupid name, people said WASP was a bad name and made up acronyms to try and prove it. Massive Appendage were told in the 80's they couldn't call themselves such because it was offensive, yet bands like Carcass followed with album covers showing body parts. People also tried to pick the shit out of Maiden for naming themselves after a "medieval" torture device which wasn't actually medieval and there is even doubts it was used as intended. Names don't make a band.
I agree with AK (because he said so) that much of them not being successful was that they didn't work hard enough and the bus passed them by. But I also think that their label should accept a large portion of the blame. Flotz really suffer from poor publicity outside America, which for a Euro based label is piss poor. Maybe poor representation can be linked to the band not working harder but the label still has a lot to answer for. The fact that people still talk about Flotz being Jason's first band, even ask whether Jason leaving is the reason they aren't bigger, proves that they never got marketing right.