Valerie
¯\(ã)/¯
- Aug 29, 2005
- 6,765
- 4
- 38
I like the bang-and-crunch theory. It really makes sense. The thing is, how do we prove it?
I saw a program on the Science Channel last night about how it may be possible to create a wormhole by stacking lasers on top of each other, intersecting from 90-degree angles, stacked with steadily increasing power until it creates a distortion in space time (like when you stir a spoon in a cup of coffee). The scientist thinks that this can theoretically create a wormhole that may be able to create pathways across "wrinkles" in the fabric of space-time, and thus allowing time travel.
But I think it's a waste of time (no pun intended) and I thank Chaos Theory for my reservations against going back in time. Going forward, however, is a different story.
Well it also depends on your perspective. You could argue that everything is reduced to solitude which is the opposite of chaos. When you dead, you're obviously not in a chaotic state.
I don't believe in Chaos Theory. I think matters naturally resolve themselves for the better.
Am I the only one that thinks Star Trek is fucking gay?
No, like Captain Picard saving JFK. That would be so awesome.
Human matters? Such trivial and rudimentary things matter not to microscopic dictators of our existence!
Nope.Am I the only one who thinks we need a thread about hilarious AIM conversations?