Erik pretty much nailed it, as I expected him to. I'm sure I've explained this a squillion times as well.
No, heavy riffs does not equal metal. Punk bands have 'heavy' riffs on 'distorted' guitars, how are they metal?
lizard said:
haha
well to each his own, but I couldn't stand the idea of listening to the same album, redone over and over and over and over again.
Fucking hell, you're only looking at the two extremes.
Why isn't it possible that metal can progress and evolve within its own parameters? Isn't it abundantly clear that we're all listening to masses amounts of metal whether it be 70's classic, NWOBHM, mid-80's 'true metal', hair metal, death metal, black metal, etc. ISN'T THIS EVIDENCE ENOUGH THAT PROGRESS HAS TAKEN PLACE SINCE 1970??
With so much progress made within metal already, why do we need to start going 'beyond the realms of metal' (heh) to seek more music? I completely advocate listening to non-metal music, just as I do myself, but I don't sit there pretending that Radiohead or Ulver are metal.
Again, what some of you are getting confused with is 'other' non-metal bands drawing from metal to craft their sound.
Here's an example:
If your foundation is in metal, and you draw from jazz, then you are still a metal band.
If your foundation is in jazz, and you draw from metal, then you are still a jazz band.
Just because a jazz band might improvise the "Paranoid" riff into a medley here or there doesn't suddenly make them metal.