I recently did a project with a band who booked studio time starting with one day, then a week in between and then the rest of the days. They would have wanted to start with drums, but I had a feeling we would need more than one day for the drums (which turned out correct), so I recommended we'd start with guitars because drum setup takes it's own time, and since it wasn't my place we were working at, it wasn't guaranteed the same mics and all the pieces of the kit were available the next weekend and so on. The band didn't feel very comfortable starting with the guitars and I ended up doing a metric shit-ton of slicing, copying and pasteing during the tracking because of some mix-ups with their song structures and such. Unfortunately, it was either that or taking a risk of wasting time doing another drum setup and hunting down gear that was missing while working on an already extremely tight schedule. I'd love to have more time with the bands (it's usually roughly a day per instrument for three to four tracks) and not divide sessions like that, but that's just how it usually goes because of the bands' schedules and the fact that they can't/don't want to pay for more tracking days.
I was just wondering how do others usually approach situations like this, and whether I made a misjudgement on my part thinking it was a necessity. Share your thoughts!
I was just wondering how do others usually approach situations like this, and whether I made a misjudgement on my part thinking it was a necessity. Share your thoughts!

