Normally I would comment on the state of American Christianity and it's negative impact, but:
a) Couldn't understand most of what he said
b) Didn't follow logic and/or Biblical proof for his points that I could understand
c) Brought in pretty much every negative presupposition and falsehood when it comes to this subject
I think he was far too tolerant of Ray Comfort. But I got the sense it wasn't from wanting to be a moral person.. but more the case that he could see it was a failed debate 2 minutes into the thing. Ray was basically pushing his agenda, and not trying to learn anything.