YT: Recto RevF vs Rackto RevG clip (1960DM cab, at250DE mic)

[Lasse Lammert]

Watch in HD!

 

[Teddyboy]

RevF for me

 

[Wohma]

RevF sounds much more articulate, although RevG sounds a bit more mean. Same settings and tubes?

 

[Lasse Lammert]

yes, same everything

 

[TomMartin]

Rev F for me too!

 

[kev]

First one nails the nevermore tone. Would probably prefer the other ones tighter sound on most stuff I guess!

 

[Melb_shredder]

I think I prefer the first to be honest, that tone is why I'd want a recto!

 

[Ermz]

First one!

 

[MetalMiller]

Wow, apart from gain structure bogner and rev f don´t sound much different.
Would you mind sharing some guitar only tracks. Never can have enough reference tones

 

[Lasse Lammert]

thanks for listening.
I've deleted the tones from the project already, sorry

 

[Jaymz]

I like the first!

 

[vespiz]

First one, yes. The second one sounds a bit "sloppy" in comparison. Still good, wouldn't hesitate to work on both!

 

[Fabrice]

I prefer the first one too.
Maybe you can use the rev G for the bottom end and the rev F por the middle and top end with some crossover.

 

[::XeS::]

RevF

 

[Clark Kent]

I bet a simple decrease in the middle knob of the RevG would've made them sound more close.

The RevF is a lot more scooped here. RevG had a more powerful tone.

The RevF fits this mix better with these settings.

 

[Lasse Lammert]

I think the presence just needs to be raised on the RevG.
Dipping the mids would give you a very different character.

 

[PhilTheBeard]

REV F!!!!!!!! FOR FUCKING BRUTAL!!!!

 

[Trevoire520]

Prefer the first one by far. Second is more fuzzy sounding.

 

[53Crëw]

I like the Rev F. Better clarity.

 

[rispsira]

I think the presence just needs to be raised on the RevG.
Dipping the mids would give you a very different character.

yea was thinking the same thing about the mids; it wouldnt work. I prefer REVF here. thanks for the clips!!