A Fair Judgment

blimey said:
*shudder*
translation: "i just got owned, and i can't think of a response, so i'll just throw out some all-purpose rebuttal to try to reclaim some of my dignity"
 
blimey said:
From WIKIpedia. LMAO. Get a valid source of information before attempting to make a point.
OMFG! you are THE authority to decide which source of information is valid or not...
 
Hypnos said:
OMFG! you are THE authority to decide which source of information is valid or not...
Fuck you dumbass.

Anybody can submit info to Wikipedia. ANYONE. It is NOT an official source of info, mofo.
 
BANNEDadrian said:
translation: "i just got owned, and i can't think of a response, so i'll just throw out some all-purpose rebuttal to try to reclaim some of my dignity"
What the fuck? The fact that you used the word un-intellectual proves you have a long way to go with the english language.

And I'll get someone who knows english to do my translations, thanks anyways.
 
blimey said:
What the fuck? The fact that you used the word un-intellectual proves you have a long way to go with the english language.

And I'll get someone who knows english to do my translations, thanks anyways.
yeeerrrrrrr an idiot!

i purposely made up the word "un-intellectual," and it made perfect sense in that context. adhering to "true grammar" or whatever was not the purpose of my post, nor is it ever. as a firm believer in descriptive linguistics (as opposed to prescriptive linguistics), i hold strongly that the english language is malleable, and words like "un-intellectual" are totally fair game.

but on the other hand, my essay-writing grammar is impeccable, i probably know 5 times the technical "rules" that you do, so STFU NOOB
 
BANNEDadrian said:
yeeerrrrrrr an idiot!

i purposely made up the word "un-intellectual," and it made perfect sense in that context. adhering to "true grammar" or whatever was not the purpose of my post, nor is it ever. as a firm believer in descriptive linguistics (as opposed to prescriptive linguistics), i hold strongly that the english language is malleable, and words like "un-intellectual" are totally fair game.

but on the other hand, my essay-writing grammar is impeccable, i probably know 5 times the technical "rules" that you do, so STFU NOOB

Wow, you purposely used the word "un-intellectual"? That is funny. That is great. So in your quote

BANNEDadrian said:
british english is not "better" than american english because they leave the "e" in "judgement," what a ridiculous and un-intellectual thing to say

You figured that adding a word that doesn't exist would be funny and purposeful. Adrian I am impressed. You figured that, by adding a non-sensical word, several posts later, you could tell me it worked in the "context".

I beg to differ actually, I think that you're a dumbfuck who doesn't even have a valyd argument.

(LOL I SPELLED VALID AS VALYD... THATS FUNNY! ESPECIALLY IN THE CONTEXT!)
 
blimey said:
Fuck you dumbass.

Anybody can submit info to Wikipedia. ANYONE. It is NOT an official source of info, mofo.

Most people who write History books and Encyclopedias aren't scholars either...

Have you looked at a history textbook? Mistakes galore.
 
SPLASTiK said:
Most people who write History books and Encyclopedias aren't scholars either...

Have you looked at a history textbook? Mistakes galore.

Well they're at least semi-credible. Dumbass 13 year old kids think its funny to post dumbshit like "wtfpwn" in wikipedia. You won't see dumb shit like that in real Encyclopedias.
 
blimey said:
Well they're at least semi-credible. Dumbass 13 year old kids think its funny to post dumbshit like "wtfpwn" in wikipedia. You won't see dumb shit like that in real Encyclopedias.

Show me the "wtfpwn" on Wikipedia.

There are people who vandalize Wikipedia but people are pretty good at catching mistakes and editing that stuff out.

But feel free to show me some errors, or better yet, contribute and make it better by fixing the articles.
 
SPLASTiK said:
Show me the "wtfpwn" on Wikipedia.

There are people who vandalize Wikipedia but people are pretty good at catching mistakes and editing that stuff out.

But feel free to show me some errors, or better yet, contribute and make it better by fixing the articles.
Tip: using Encarta, the Internet, and having a basic understanding of life will permit you to get all the information you'll need.
 
blimey said:
Wow, you purposely used the word "un-intellectual"? That is funny. That is great. So in your quote



You figured that adding a word that doesn't exist would be funny and purposeful. Adrian I am impressed. You figured that, by adding a non-sensical word, several posts later, you could tell me it worked in the "context".

I beg to differ actually, I think that you're a dumbfuck who doesn't even have a valyd argument.

(LOL I SPELLED VALID AS VALYD... THATS FUNNY! ESPECIALLY IN THE CONTEXT!)

how is that word nonsensical? it makes perfect sense to me, and i assumed it would make perfect sense to any competent reader of the english language

EDIT: btw blimey, i can't even believe the other members of this forum put up with you
 
blimey said:
Tip: using Encarta, the Internet, and having a basic understanding of life will permit you to get all the information you'll need.

So you can't find any errors? Nice cop out.
Last I checked... Wikipedia was part of the internet too. :tickled:
 
BANNEDadrian said:
how is that word nonsensical? it makes perfect sense to me, and i assumed it would make perfect sense to any competent reader of the english language

EDIT: btw blimey, i can't even believe the other members of this forum put up with you
They do! You know how I know? IM NOT BANNED, FUCKWAD.

And I'm also not an asshole to nice people.