^ I renamed those clips. Check the OP!
@Hades: Yeah, to be honest I was hoping for a bit more of an audible end difference here too. In other cases Nebula has been far and beyond better, but here I would consider the Waves e-Chan pretty much useful. I guess there's a reason it's my workhorse channel strip. One thing I will say though is that they do definitely sound different when you solo the tracks. The plug-in seems very strong around the 2k area and any high boosts seem to really bring it forward... it's a real flat sort of presence, not at all analogue-like. The highs *are* marginally better and more airy on the Nebula version. Check the overheads for this. I boosted 4dB at 10kHz for both, so you should be able to hear a difference.
Over the course of an entire mix I think there's enough there to add up for a benefit, but really if you want convenience and something good for workflow, there is no worry with sticking to the Waves SSL. This sort of justifies my heavy use of that plug-in.
I wish I could do another saturation vs ITB shoot-out but that kinda thing takes ages and I CBF.
What we need is for a developer like Softube or whatever to just make a great UI for an SSL strip and cram Nebula under the hood, perhaps with some algorithmic randomizations per-instance to approximate electronic variances between channels. Then use their own algorithmic compressor, which they seem to be good at. The combination of the two would be ace, and the workflow would be much better than the clunky thing Nebula presently is.