Metaltastic
Member
- Feb 20, 2005
- 19,930
- 1
- 36
I don't know what you mean by 'keep up with', you could clarify that a bit. If you're talking about tone, that's subjective, and there's no reason why a solid-state amp tweaked right could fool someone into thinking that they were listening to a tube amp. If you're talking about reliability, there's no comparison at all - a decently made solid state amp doesn't need tubes or transformers replaced, is less sensitive to heat change, doesn't wear nearly as much over time, and is much safer from shock.
On top of that, after all is said and done in amp technology the modern tube amp has far from a good history as far as technology goes - the 12AX7 is a shitty tube that was chosen for availability and price, not tone, and the only reason one can justify its current use is that everyone has heard of it and everything else uses it. I'm supposed to believe that it makes everything sound magically better through... fairy dust? Fuck that. I'd bet good money that a guitarist who didn't get told constantly that tubes sound better because... they do, you know?... wouldn't give three-quarters of a shit about them if you gave him a good tube amp and a good solid-state amp and told him to have a go at them.
Jeff
Your points definitely make sense from a purely theoretical standpoint, dude, but I'm not clear what your stance is on the comparison; are you saying that you do think solid state is capable of matching tubes for sound quality, and if one were to do a blind-folded tone test, no one would be able to tell the difference? Or are you advocating that our notion of tubes sounding the best is just from having heard them so much and being used to them? Cuz if it's the latter, well, that's not gonna change any time soon, and if it's the former, then give some examples man; "put your money where your mouth is," so to speak.