DiscipleOfThePit
Metal F*cking Iain!
Ha!Andy Sneap said:I knew that pissed in Barcelona pic was going to show up somewhere down the line.
I hate getting snapped when drunk because, 9 times out of 10, the picture will come back to haunt you!
Ha!Andy Sneap said:I knew that pissed in Barcelona pic was going to show up somewhere down the line.
metalkingdom said:You kinda get to the point where you've outgrown EQ and Electronic Musician(at least for the recording aspect of EM). The vast majority of the info and tips offered in those mags are things that highly experienced engineers know already. They are both more useful for those who own project studios, as opposed to those who work in the big studios. I never really looked at Mix's articles as "ass-kissing". I think that it's more like a tribute to your peers and those engineers and producers who are admired in the real music business (which is why I'd like to see Andy featured). Aside from technical specs, product reviews are merely one's opinion - which doesn't mean much when you know that you yourself have your own tastes and likes/dislikes. There's plenty of substance in Mix. Instead of "how to" articles, there are first hand accounts of high profile and historic sessions that are generally more interesting to those that have done this for a long time.
For several years after I started engineering, Recording, EQ, and EM were the only mags whose content I actually understood. I definitely learned LOTS from them (usually read on the can!). It's hard to relate to some of the things mentioned in Mix like Telefunken mic pre's and AMS s-dmx delay/samplers if you've never used them.
I read EM for music creation and MIDI related stuff. Sound on Sound is a good magazine, as well as Audio Media. I have a personal issue with EQ.
Kazrog said:I wish I could afford a Telefunken anything, they rock!
Andy Sneap said:I knew that pissed in Barcelona pic was going to show up somewhere down the line.
James Murphy said:the feature should be cool.. but it's not a column as far as i know.
JV said:Ya know why none of those magazines (..this is my personal opionion of course) won't feature Andy?....Because metal is not mainstream music....and that is sad,sad,sad, letme tell ya' sad. Mix had a pretty good write up about Dave (Shitvavana) Grohl and his Poo, I mean Foo Fighters band. The freakin' equipment they listed, I won't bore ya. Then they brought in Elliot Scheiner to mix, and then it went off to some big name for mastering.
I"m reading this and (no bullshit) saying to myself..."...ya know there's a guy over in England, who tracks, mixes, masters, albums all by himself. What are these guys blowin' themselves about?"
I also enjoy blues (...please don't throw me otta'here). The guitar tones on some of the new recordings,are to me, fantastic. Like I'll ever see the engineer/producer who did the album in one of those magazines. Ya know...how he/she got those tones .....simply because blues like metal is not Foo crap mainstream. ALL those magazines promote....."if you want big time results, you need big time equipment." I think Andy"s work (...and James's work for that matter) speak volumes..............to bad the "in the know" crowd don't.
JV said:Hey kazrog!
While I think Dave Grohl is a cool guy, I still don't like his band. The magazines I was referring to (EQ, E.M Mix), seem to cater mostly to pop/mainstream engineers/producers.
I just think that guys, such as Andy, should get a little more recognition based on their talent......not the genre of music they produce.
Hopkins-WitchfinderGeneral said:imo the "underground" we know will just continue to float to the top whilst the truely experimental and visionary will always remain in the "true underground."
Hopkins-WitchfinderGeneral said:Now they're doing really damn well, on myspace even half the emo kids name them in their fave bands section.