AchrisK
Weakling
I think it's different than that. I'm not saying I can explain it or understand it, or even that I myself would do it that way. But I don't think that is a valid comparison. Especially since you yourself have heard the "message".
I think it's different than that. I'm not saying I can explain it or understand it, or even that I myself would do it that way. But I don't think that is a valid comparison. Especially since you yourself have heard the "message".
seriously... if there is some deity who's going to send you to hell for not believing in something for which there is no proof, he/she/it is pretty despicable...
But there are alot of "messages". What makes a certain one the right, and how do one know?I think it's different than that. I'm not saying I can explain it or understand it, or even that I myself would do it that way. But I don't think that is a valid comparison. Especially since you yourself have heard the "message".
you mean the "gospel" message? well the problem is that there is no proof that the gospel message is true so the problem still stands.
i mean if we had some clear proof that some of the miracles, etc. in the bible were true such as the creation in six days, or the resurrection, etc. then yeah i would have heard the message and have some convincing proof of it. but there is no evidence that any of the things in the bible that would prove it to be the word of God in fact happened. As such I may have heard the "message" of Christianity but I have seen no clear evidence that it is anymore true than the message of any other religion. Hence I am under no moral or intellectual obligation that it is true.
You completely missed his point. He is under no moral or intellectual obligation to believe that it is true unless there is sufficient evidence to support the claim, which at this point, there isn't. Thus, whether or not it actually is true, is completely irrelevant to the discussion.Unless it is true.
I believe in God. I believe in Science as well. I believe the big bang was fueled by God.
And as Einstein said: "Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind."
I don't believe in what the Catholics believe. They don't deserve their fucking name. Catholic means universal, and how is it universal to say people of every religion but yours go to Hell? By their teachings, all the fucking prophets went to hell, because none of them were Catholic.
I don't believe in Hell, I don't believe people go there if they are bad. Or that they go to Heaven if they are good. That whole concept was copied from the Elysian Fields and Tartarus in my opinion. The only thing I follow is the ten commandments, but I'm a little shaky on that because the translation was probably obscured over the years.
I'm an atheist that is a fan of Anton Lavey's form of Philosophical Satanism, though I was raised Southern Baptist.
But I do feel atheists may get a bad rap becaus eof the more militant ones, I'm really not militant at all, you know, the kinds who think being an asshole to everyone about their beliefs and always bitching about wanting Under God taken out of the flag when we're just a minority afterall, and this is a Democratic society, also ones how feel we need special treatment over things. To me, all I really care about is having people not discriminate against me or not respecting my beliefs, otherwise people doing things like court cases and all this shit like Newdow I could really care about.
seriously... if there is some deity who's going to send you to hell for not believing in something for which there is no proof, he/she/it is pretty despicable...
that's like me going to up to some tribal African and blowing his brains out for not knowing about Beethoven's 9th symphony
EXACTLY. Any time a theist asks where do atheists' morals come from, I ask whether, if presented with solid proof that god did not exist, he would go out raping and murdering without compunction. If he says no, his point is disproved. If he says yes then I tell him to stay in church.and if you need the promise of some glorious eternal afterlife in order to do good and charitable deeds and be a decent human being while on this earth, then what does that say about your character?
But you have absolutely know basis for this belief. You just believe what you want without a shred of evidence. I can't wrap my head around this type of thought. It is really alien to me.Mathiäs;6773089 said:One of my beliefs is that there is no "right" religion...there is one divine power for all religions, etc. This is hard for me to explain, but here is my basic idea of it:
Atheists - go and stay in the grave
Christians - go to their own heaven
Satanists - go to hellz
Pagans - go wherever (fuck I don't know..)
etc
If there is in fact a Creator who has his own rules and who feels so strongly about them that he deems it necessary to reward or punish humans based or how closely their moral codes match his own, then what's to stop him from actually making his presence know to humanity so that we don't all follow the wrong paths accidentally?It's easy enough to apply rules you feel are valid, and I can totally understand the tendancy to do so. It's what comes naturally. But if there is a Creator who has his own rules which don't necessarily fit with what your used to, then how valid are those rules in that situation? That's all I am saying. But it is true that nobody is under any obligation to believe it.
They're plenty valid still - if there is a creator who is to say that we are bound by his rules? If there is a creator what stops us from not giving a shit and going on with our lives?
EDIT: In regards to earlier Ack post