That's kinda sad. What if you're an un-famous signed band? Hell, the famous ones don't need the money they might be losing out on(which is what the legal argument will be based around).Originally posted by Devilish monster from the hill
I don't understand why they sued Audiogalaxy...
all the coyrighted files (of famous signed bands) were unallowed to download.
For instance if you search for Tool songs, you can see all the files are blocked...
...Which pretty much sums up the whole argument. Problem is, neither side can prove conclusively who is right. I've seen many people on UM say they download and then buy, but I have doubts that that attitude is in the majority, which means there is harm being done. On the other hand, there are many bands that have benefitted from people downloading some songs. So both sides can say it is good/bad, who really knows. I guess the judge will tell us what is right......Originally posted by Wanderingblade
Also, last I checked, they're not loosing money through this. I don't have whole stats and the like, but I've spent quite a bit of money I wouldn't have elsewise without Audiogalaxy, Morpheus and others...
Originally posted by Opet
Well, if there was Napster... then AG, I'm sure they'll be another.