Axe-Fx II VS Axe-Fx Ultra

In a near future...





clrk.png


:loco: (Don't get me wrong, its a joke) Sorry dude, I had some free time waiting for some reamps to finish...
 
For those that do care. Check my soundcloud for a new comparison.

Fenix, that image you posted was awesome! :D Too bad I can't have that as my signature. I'll bet $500 I can make Zoom + match EQ sound better than guitar tone "JessTD" has ever come up with.
 
Enough with the personal attacks, dude - I've said nothing even remotely personal towards you in this thread but apparently you get off on calling me girls names and talking shit about my tones. I honestly don't care; you can spend your time match eq'ing - I'll work on label releases.

Either you fucked up in your English and said something you didn't mean to or you're dead-set on not admitting to saying something you clearly said or at the veeeery least implied. Get over it.
 
Clark Kent said:
Fenix, that image you posted was awesome! :D Too bad I can't have that as my signature. I'll bet $500 I can make Zoom + match EQ sound better than guitar tone "JessTD" has ever come up with.
Click to expand...

Man this statement alone is worth money. I think you are a better comedian than engineer.
 
Jeff likes the Kemper profiler...

EDIT: ... he has never tried it ....

EDIT 2: ... still he knows Kemper better than me who has tried it ....

<3
 
006 said:
I didn't say it's the only place. But I have yet to find another place that had as many people that didn't talk out of their ass with misinformation. Speaking of which, Gearslutz is full of people that talk out of their ass. I got banned from there for posting the same mix twice for comparison, saying one was done with analog gear and the other ITB, and magically one got voted on more as being the "analog" one. Somehow tons of users "that actually make records that people listen to" heard more "analog warmth" and "richness" in one of the mixes. Even though they were the same mix, both in the box with all digital software. I trolled them hard, and proved a point, and they couldn't take it. I'm not saying they're all full of it, but it was quite interesting the majority heard analog qualities where there were none.

I don't really care if you count me one way or the other. I've got work released on Willowtip and Relapse records, I don't need your verification to show that I know anything about audio engineering. What have you done?

I don't know how you equate people pointing out the problems with your comparison with shedding tears or menstruating, but whatever. Your comparison is heavily flawed. Even after agreeing that it's flawed, you want to take it as evidence of one unit being "better" than another. You make no sense. Given that and your obsession with match EQ, I wouldn't count you in a category of knowing anything about audio engineering either.
Click to expand...

Can't you point me in the direction of some of your work? Always looking to listen to professional mixes done by members on this forum (mixes that are for actual label bands) to better myself.

Also, 006: Your avatar is total win.
 
Haha... it sucks doesn't it? I told you so and you still went and bought it. Hahahahahaha...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

chdrummer
axe fx standard vs. ultra
Replies
3
Views
2K
Backline
chdrummer
C
jeid
Axe Fx Ultra
Replies
27
Views
3K
Backline
Alphanumeric
A
Clark Kent
Axe-Fx II vs Axe-Fx Ultra
Replies
20
Views
3K
Backline
Matt-Steele
M
Matt-Steele
Axe FX II Quantum Firmware
Replies
10
Views
2K
Backline
Fluffbot
F
X
Fractal AXE-FX 2
Replies
3
Views
1K
Backline
Harry Hughes
H
Top Bottom
Back