Badbird
Never banned
Good quote, but I don't put any stock in Glenn Beck. He lost me at faith and charity.
The guy has said he's a libertarian. WTF
Good quote, but I don't put any stock in Glenn Beck. He lost me at faith and charity.
No you're not. You're a typical libertarian on the internet. I follow a lot of libertarian blogs and you spout basically the same memes that 90% of those people do.
No, I'm much more than that buddy. Libertarian-Athiesm embodies a much more larger and specific worldview. We are a rare breed and unlike many of them, I could care less about finding our purpose for living because it is all one big fucking joke; just not a very good one(hence why I drink).
Btw, why do you keeps tabs on libertarian blogs if you oppose them? Are you the real Big Brother? Holy shit! Nice to meet you.
His statements were contradictory. Ayn Rand's philosophy is based around non-contradiction.
I don't know much about the details of Ayn Rand's philosophizing (besides her misrepresentation of Kantian ethics) but it seems kind of lulzy to me to base a philosophical system around the principle of non-contradiction. I mean, it's not really that special of a principle or capable of generating any particularly deep truths. It's just basically assumed in debate in general. Honestly, how the hell do you generate an entire system of ethics, epistemology, aesthetics, etc. from the principle of non-contradiction? Maybe I'm misunderstanding what Rand was actually trying to do. Maybe there is more to it than that.
Ayn Rand said that if there was any contradiction, to check your premises.
Anyhow, please state how I was contradictory. Since I can't click on those links and see the context of what I said; I will endeavor to trust you enough to cut and paste said remarks, honestly.
If everything is "one big fucking joke" then why are you so concerned about a normative doctrine such as libertarianism?
You clearly don't know anything about me. I am a libertarian.
Then why are you breaking my balls???
Btw, many say that they are libertarian but are really faux-libertarian; espousing such inane shit, like that people shouldn't really own property after all.
I sincerely hope that you aren't one of those.
That quote by Ayn Rand applies only to fact. Not opinion.
The fact that you're busy spending a decent portion of your time arguing with people on the internet about opinions is contradictory with objectivism. I'm not going to bother wasting my time to cut and paste statements that you would still endorse. If you were not a contradiction with the philosophy, you would be busy doing something productive.
Before you respond, I will let you know that I agree with much of what you said. However, you have the wrong way of approaching it.
I don't know much about the details of Ayn Rand's philosophizing (besides her misrepresentation of Kantian ethics) but it seems kind of lulzy to me to base a philosophical system around the principle of non-contradiction. I mean, it's not really that special of a principle or capable of generating any particularly deep truths. It's just basically assumed in debate in general. Honestly, how the hell do you generate an entire system of ethics, epistemology, aesthetics, etc. from the principle of non-contradiction? Maybe I'm misunderstanding what Rand was actually trying to do. Maybe there is more to it than that.
The guy has said he's a libertarian. WTF
I don't know much about the details of Ayn Rand's philosophizing (besides her misrepresentation of Kantian ethics) but it seems kind of lulzy to me to base a philosophical system around the principle of non-contradiction. I mean, it's not really that special of a principle or capable of generating any particularly deep truths. It's just basically assumed in debate in general. Honestly, how the hell do you generate an entire system of ethics, epistemology, aesthetics, etc. from the principle of non-contradiction? Maybe I'm misunderstanding what Rand was actually trying to do. Maybe there is more to it than that.
Because even though I may be in broad agreement with somebody on political matters that doesn't mean I have to think they're a perfectly reasonable human being 100% of the time.
Uhhh, well, my Master's thesis is basically a defense of libertarian property rights as they pertain to distributive justice. Anyway, I have never encountered a self-described libertarian that thinks people shouldn't own property. What in the world are you talking about?
All Ayn Rand really does is break down Philosophy ( Metaphysics, Epistemology,Ethics,Politics and aesthetics.) into three basic axioms - Existence,consciousness and identity.
So existence is perceived through consciousness, and forms an object or entity to have an identity.
Primacy of existence over consciousness, which she feels is self evident and non contradictory.
Well now this, I find insulting. Please state succinctly where I have been unreasonable and I will bow down to you and get the hell off the internet.
Well it gets pretty ridiculous. If you go on youtube, you can find all kinds of pennyanny rants by self described "libertarian-socialists" or "libertarian-communists" like that is even possible.
I'm too lazy to go back through the thread. Anyway, why should you get off the internet? You can learn things on the internet, especially from me. Stay.
Oh ok. I kind of had a suspicion you were referring to those types. I guess that according to those people the term 'libertarian' originated in the left-wing anarchist movement in Europe, before the term was adopted by American libertarians. Anyway, I don't really care that much about terminology. Their views are still basically stupid as far as I'm concerned.
Right. Much like how we as libertarians are the REAL liberals.
This may sound elitist(and it is) but I definitely think that the two most enlightened positions to come out of the Enlightenment are Athiesm and Liberalism(Libertarianism). And today, in what I call The Age Of Unenlightenment, those two positions are quite frowned upon.
Libertarianism is not the same thing as classical liberalism.