Dakryn's Batshit Theory of the Week
- Thread starter Ender Rises
- Start date
Der Morgenstern
Trailer Park Bacchus
Just tired of his bullshit.
Like go read a book that isn't endorsed by Alex Jones, motherfucker.
Like go read a book that isn't endorsed by Alex Jones, motherfucker.
V.V.V.V.V.
Houses Ov Mercury
Jimmy... Dead.
contemplative curmudgeon
Badbird
Never banned
Badbird
Never banned
Dak
mentat
So you are looking for/learning more ways to fuck up nature. Congrats. You aren't just part of the problem, but given what you just told me,a member of the worst group of earth-rapers, and no amount of attaboying in this thread changes that. Also, none of this has anything to do with Alex Jones (who is just one more disinfo artist).
Regarding rhetoric: you are doing the exact same thing I am, but from the "opposite side of the street". Calling me ignorant, self-righteous, or judgemental is at best, the pot talking to the kettle.
Saparmurat_Niyazov
Member
OK, what about the irrefutable fact that the world oil supply is on it's downward curve? We've used over 50% of it. And there is no infrastructure in place anywhere to convert fully to natural gas, electrical, or whatever else. There never will be either, because the amount of funding and skilled labor needed does not exist. No amount of management can tackle all these issues for nearly 10 billion people. I'm not going to get ugly with you like others on this page, but I'm afraid you don't see the big picture.
Der Morgenstern
Trailer Park Bacchus
SCIENTISTS
ALL WE DO IS FUCK WITH NATURE
DAKRYN SAYS SO
CUZ HE KNOWS
You honestly have no clue as to what I do, but wanted to have a knee-jerk reaction to it. Fair play.
Earth-raper. That's a new one.
ALL WE DO IS FUCK WITH NATURE
DAKRYN SAYS SO
CUZ HE KNOWS
You honestly have no clue as to what I do, but wanted to have a knee-jerk reaction to it. Fair play.
Earth-raper. That's a new one.
Dak
mentat
Yes. All scientists. Because that's what I said. 
Which supports decentralization. You are proving my point for me.
Which supports decentralization. You are proving my point for me.
Der Morgenstern
Trailer Park Bacchus
Saparmurat_Niyazov
Member
The folks at Wikileaks are being blatently hostile towards the US now, IMO.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-11923766
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-11923766
Dak
mentat
I can put Bioengineering or Biocatalyst into google and get a fountain of information telling me what you are attempting to tamper with. Bioengineering as general field has yeilded us things like GMO crops, which are/will be directly responsible for the death of millions/billions. Biocatalyst work has recently been seized on by poison producers peddlers such as Merck, GlaxoSmithKline, etc. to make more lethal poisons.
So I was wrong. You are doing something to decrease the population. Just doing it from the elitist viewpoint of "everyone else needs to die first" though.
I don't know why anyone is paying Wikileaks any attention. The information is obviously harmless to the real interests of the US government or it wouldn't make it out into the light of day.
Saparmurat_Niyazov
Member
I wanted to stay out of this argument, but you have to have centralized institutions to disseminate highly technical knowledge. Bureaucracy is bad, sure, but Uncle Bill tinkering in his shed is not going to solve overpopulation on his own.
Dak
mentat
We aren't trying to solve overpopulation, we are trying to solve mismanagement, and decentralization will solve much by default. Centralization is extremely wasteful in transportation costs alone. Purely speaking from a food standpoint, the majority of technology that is employed to "improve" food production is destroying long term food production and destroying nutrition density in the short term and long term.
Saparmurat_Niyazov
Member
Are you talking about organic food vs processed/engineered food? Either way, there is not enough to go around for people to be properly nourished. Now if you want people's life expectancies to drop to about 25, then sure, we can feed a world population of 50 billion, no problem.
Now, another attempt to change the subject:
The "freedoms" awarded us by globalization:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-latin-america-11920645
V.V.V.V.V.
Houses Ov Mercury
Dak
mentat
Since the majority of currently starving people in the world live in Africa (which has plenty of farmland), millions of square miles of undeveloped land elsewhere in the world, there are possibilies. But it would require a return to some former ways of life (which currently no one wants to do), which some theories indicate will happen anyway.
My concern is that before we can return to more wholistic living, that companies like Monsanto (probably Der Morg's dream job) will have polluted the all of the original plants and we will have no natural seed producing grains/vegetables left without eradicating them all and then breaking into the "Doomsday Vault".
Blame drug laws.
what does this even mean
It means I am fairly certain those "leaks" are on purpose.
Regarding your laughter: Recreational drugs far less likely to kill you than prescribed drugs
Jimmy... Dead.
contemplative curmudgeon
Hey Dak, I'm curious ( and I'm not being condescending ) what did you major in and study in college?
Right or wrong you seem to have a varied opinion on almost everything political. I always thought you were a political science major.
Right or wrong you seem to have a varied opinion on almost everything political. I always thought you were a political science major.
