Einherjar86
Active Member
https://curryja.files.wordpress.com/2015/12/curry-senate-testimony-2015.pdf
Senate testimony by https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judith_Curry
Skeptics have a right.
Skepticism is an appropriate response to any field of knowledge that has limitations (i.e. all fields of knowledge). Curry's operation is a necessary albeit often overlooked strategy of meta-commentary; she's pulling back and assessing the epistemological limits of studying global climate.
I think she makes excellent points on the political rhetoric surrounding climate change and the IPCC's emphasis on consensus, which results in the downplaying of uncertainty and resultant overconfidence. But Curry herself is still a climate change scientist, and I don't think she would say that her essay is cause for decreasing the funding of climate change science (which is likely to happen under Trump) or refusing to consider various social policies that decrease carbon emissions (also likely to happen).
Skepticism is healthy, but you can be skeptical until the next ice age.
