death penalty

i'm against it... it's just too quick and painless...

i prefer them to rot in jail to pay for their crimes and sins.

besides, if you realize someone is not guilty, you can always free them if they are in jail...

but i don't know what can you do if you already executed an innocent person :zombie:
 
i'm against it... it's just too quick and painless...

i prefer them to rot in jail to pay for their crimes and sins.

besides, if you realize someone is not guilty, you can always free them if they are in jail...

but i don't know what can you do if you already executed an innocent person :zombie:

very true. i say put them all on a ship and send to argentina. now that is punishment
 
Look it's extremely complicated. Those of us who believe in reincarnation and karmic retribution know that in the current life, karma will manifest to whatever we do, i.e. suffer if a murder was unnecessary, however if they go into the next life they will not know what they are suffering for.
 
or send them on an island full of gays
PS. thats we should do whit gays lol

The most striking protection of innocent life has been seen in Texas, which executes more murderers than any other state. According to JFA (Justice for All), the Texas murder rate in 1991 was 15.3 per 100,000. By 1999, it had fallen to 6.1 -- a drop of 60 percent. Within Texas, the most aggressive death penalty prosecutions are in Harris County (the Houston area). Since the resumption of executions in 1982, the annual number of Harris County murders has plummeted from 701 to 241 -- a 72 percent decrease
and to show it helped in texas