A common occurrence eh? How common are you suggesting? Do you have anything besides anecdotes and conjectures? Again this all goes back to the ridiculous and paranoid fantasy world of "rape culture". It's grounded in the sexist stereotype that all males, especially young boys are sexually aggressive in nature and are encouraged by western culture to explore these tendencies. It goes a little something like this "all men are potential rapists because they only have the ability to do so and they're always thinking about doing it". Which I pointed out earlier is complete and total fucking horseshit. Both men and women commit rape. End of discussion period. There are countless accounts and cases of this, go look them up for yourself. As for the "it's just in his nature" thing, yes it is in the nature of a young heterosexual man with a functioning libido to be sexually attracted to feminine aesthetics. I.e breasts, thighs, soft skin or what have you. It's just reversed for young women and masculine features. It's obviously deeper than that but for the sake of staying on topic let's not delve into that.
I don't understand the enormous social stigma towards the male half though. Male sexual desire can be perverted and is considered to be aggressive while female sexual desire is somehow mysterious and romantic. The amount of double standards are too numerous to even begin to list but I hope you see my point. Anyways last time I checked we were actually living in a society that is designed to have men worship the ground women walk on. Males are bread winners and females just have to produce children and put on some fucking make up. And before you fucking say "oh but they have to do the house work and take care of children." Let me actually put this into perspective for you. You're telling me that a woman having to do the dishes and cook dinner actually has more strenuous responsibilities and is socially and economically more valuable the a man with an engineering degree working 80 plus hours a week inside plants and factories? Which is of course to support the woman and or children. You really believe that? If you do you then I'm afraid you're mentally ill.
Women also don't have to carry the cross of "masculinity" or "being a man" aka the emotional and intellectual shackles of permanent stoicism. To always adhere to "women and children first" ethics. A male's value is determined by his ability to provide for women and children. Things like the sensibilities, concerns and even emotions of a man are totally irrelevant because he's supposed to "be a man". Men think their self worth comes from a woman and of course having all of the things that are meant to attract women like having a lot of money. Its not benevolent sexism towards women it's slavery for men. Women benefit most from this shit and I don't see how it's fucking despicable to shame the women who abuse their exalted status in society to severely damage the lives of others by getting loaded with a bunch of guys and then having drunken consensual sex with them. Fuck em all, take responsibility for your shit.