Nothinggod
New Metal Member
- Mar 10, 2004
- 359
- 1
- 0
I'm not so sure. While we are on opinions, I guess whether it is fun or not is a matter of opinion too.
My Man Mahmoud said:Dude, you listen to Robbie Williams. That pretty much puts paid to all your claims of superior taste.
And heterosexuality, for that matter...
one of your more creative ones in my opinionNineFeetUnderground said:
worldwide_suicide said:Robbie Williams is better than 90% of metal so stfu
imho i think thats true of most genres tbphNineFeetUnderground said:95% but so is a lot of stuff. metal is an awful genre in most respects. there just happens to be a handful of phenominal acts keeping it afloat still.
FRUGiHOYi said:imho i think thats true of most genres tbph
worldwide_suicide said:it's funny how "metal-heads" claim to know what real music is and how honest metal is and everything else is shit... when they are probably listening to the worst ramification rock music has
Nothinggod said:To me metal is just a word, I don't think anyone could really give a definitive definition of what metal is that is exclusive to any other type of music. If they could I would love to see it. My opinion is that the problem with "metal" and any other type of music is that most musicians really don't have a clue about anything they are doing. When it comes to playing most of them learn a few techniques or phrases but never learn about the big picture. Which is fine if you want to play music in a bar room and do standards of your favourite songs. On the other hand most musicians want to be looked at as composers and despite having little or no expertise in the field or even a broad understanding of what their contemporaries are doing they want to be judged as innovators. When you have a thousands Opeth clone bands, for example, that don't realy get the theory behind what Opeth are doing you end up with bands that not only are not innovative but bands that are doing what they think is homage to their 'heros' badly. I don't particularly believe in any such thing as innovation anyway, but that is another story. Basically what "95%" of bands in general are doing are diatonic variations of I IV V progressions and as long as it "sounds right" they are convinced that they have written a masterpiece. Well of course it sounds right, that is what we in the west are all conditioned to expect. Then again I also believe that music can only be judged by the individual according to thier own sense of aesthtic.
worldwide_suicide said:i think NFU is right here... metal music with a few exemptions is a shame
Aarohi said:Maybe because creating metal is not as easy as creating, say, pop. You have more tools in your hand in metal compared to any other genre.. the freedom accompanying metal gives it an edge over most other genres to me.
And you're only going to find both empty deserts and rich evergreen valleys only on this very planet.. not on, say, mars. Metal is more equipped, and it having so much variety within it gives room to so much. There's more space for experimentalization, and thats what makes shit bands' existance possible. A sacred lotus can only grow in a swamp.