I guess what I'm trying to say is that any human being claiming to have the answers of the universe is incredibly deluded.
I know. Einstein. What loose bolt.
I typically side with the agnostic point of view. I don't like putting my foot down and saying, "This doesn't exist because I don't believe it does", just as much as I don't like putting my foot down and saying that I think something does exist when I could be wrong in both cases.
Agnosticism is boring and arrogant. To claim that we can't know the ultimate answer is just as deluded as to claim that we already do. Strictly speaking, whether we can know or not is irrelevant. Religion's failure is to restrict the belief system to a set of principles and raise the alarm when they are violated by those that question. Science isn't a set of absolute principles but a set of methods by which knowledge is proved good enough through "trial by fire" to be considered factual. The existence of God(s) is not one such thing, so it would appear that science says God does not exist, when all it says is nothing about God at all There is no "Standard Theory of God," e.g. Since our civilization is pretty much built on science which works it would be folly to simply disregard its methods in special cases. Since science does not admit or disprove the existence of God, those questions are irrelevant--and those that don't realize it don't see the uselessness of this debate.
We humans are so self-centered and short-sighted that we sometimes forget that we're not even ants in the galaxy...we're not even amoebas.