_Brutalism_
Member
- May 14, 2008
- 581
- 0
- 16
To be honest, I think a lot of the hate towards this "death-core" scene is mainly brewed from the looks and fads from its followers.
I for one like certain death-core bands...but I hate the catagory name. Today, any extreme music with a breakdown has to have a -core allotted to it. I personally think that if any bands from the golden era that incorporated groove to their sound came out today, they'd be labelled with some kind of -core to their genre name.
The interesting thing to note in my opinion is that if a random listener who had NO IDEA of what a deathcore/hardcore scene kid would look like, he would listen to it from a fresh perspective. That is the case with me. I live in a country where metal doesn't have a very big scene at all, I'm talking numbers below a thousand, and if you had to cut out the trendies, well you'll be left with a roomfull. Anyway, I happen to like this type of sound and find it appealing to my ears, but luckily for me, I am geographically disjointed from anything resembling a -core scene which would actually be noticable. This way, I happened to only care about the music, not who is making it. Of course, with some research, it became evident that this music was aimed at an audience of debatable class and knowledge of metal. Just looking at the way these people react at shows - slam dancing being the most protuberant proof, I just shook my head with disgust.
I think that the image when conjoined with the music is really playing an influence on its critisism, which in my eyes doesn't do the music justice. HOWEVER, since the creators of the music in question are emerging from the same background as its shameful trend community, it throws me into a dilemma whether it should be supported or not. But then again, if one had to base his opinion on the music on 1) the personality of the musician, 2) the looks of the musician, 3) the mainstream audience and all that breeds within it, then everyone's musical preference would be narrowed quite considerably.
I for one like certain death-core bands...but I hate the catagory name. Today, any extreme music with a breakdown has to have a -core allotted to it. I personally think that if any bands from the golden era that incorporated groove to their sound came out today, they'd be labelled with some kind of -core to their genre name.
The interesting thing to note in my opinion is that if a random listener who had NO IDEA of what a deathcore/hardcore scene kid would look like, he would listen to it from a fresh perspective. That is the case with me. I live in a country where metal doesn't have a very big scene at all, I'm talking numbers below a thousand, and if you had to cut out the trendies, well you'll be left with a roomfull. Anyway, I happen to like this type of sound and find it appealing to my ears, but luckily for me, I am geographically disjointed from anything resembling a -core scene which would actually be noticable. This way, I happened to only care about the music, not who is making it. Of course, with some research, it became evident that this music was aimed at an audience of debatable class and knowledge of metal. Just looking at the way these people react at shows - slam dancing being the most protuberant proof, I just shook my head with disgust.
I think that the image when conjoined with the music is really playing an influence on its critisism, which in my eyes doesn't do the music justice. HOWEVER, since the creators of the music in question are emerging from the same background as its shameful trend community, it throws me into a dilemma whether it should be supported or not. But then again, if one had to base his opinion on the music on 1) the personality of the musician, 2) the looks of the musician, 3) the mainstream audience and all that breeds within it, then everyone's musical preference would be narrowed quite considerably.