- Dec 8, 2005
- 145
- 0
- 16
hey all,
has anyone ever been annoyed by the constant referring to opeth whenever some metal band puts out an album because they have like ONE acoustic part in a song?
i've been led to buying cds because the reviews on the stickers said for example: "amazing, epic music. a fusion of (insert death metal band here)'s brutality and opeth-like acoustic passages".
then you whip in the cd and you hear ONE acoustic part somewhere which sounds NOTHING like opeth.
this has been the case with the band "becoming the archetype", while the band itself is not bad, i just hate to see all these comparisons to opeth which are flat-out not true.
has anyone else experienced this?
has anyone ever been annoyed by the constant referring to opeth whenever some metal band puts out an album because they have like ONE acoustic part in a song?
i've been led to buying cds because the reviews on the stickers said for example: "amazing, epic music. a fusion of (insert death metal band here)'s brutality and opeth-like acoustic passages".
then you whip in the cd and you hear ONE acoustic part somewhere which sounds NOTHING like opeth.
this has been the case with the band "becoming the archetype", while the band itself is not bad, i just hate to see all these comparisons to opeth which are flat-out not true.
has anyone else experienced this?