how many of you guys use C4 on your master??

It doesn't change the EQ, it merely compresses it. So it is still there. It's very useful if you have an overall woof that you don't want to EQ out, which would thin the mix out as well, but rather just comp it so that it doesn't...woof.

And I'd be surprised to hear any mastering engineers not using mbc...amateur and pro alike.

~006
 
And I'd be surprised to hear any mastering engineers not using mbc...amateur and pro alike.

~006

Yes, I'm sure many talented mastering engineers can get great results with it, by I am by no means calling myself an ME, and I have liked the results a lot more when I try to fix it in the mix. If I was in the position of having all my mixes sent to professional mastering, that would be a completely different case.
 
I'm not saying that it is basically not making sense to use MBC at a mastering stage.
But afaik mastering engineers only use it to basically fix things that maybe went wrong during mixing and rarely for character, am I wrong here?

So in other words... there wouldn't be any need for extra compression in MBC if otherwise it already sounds great without.
 
Sometimes I use it, but usually only in Wavelab when I'm mastering. I never really use it in a mix on the master bus.
 
I'd never use multiband for mastering unless it's for subtle corrective purposes.
Most of the time I'd use Izotope Ozone, and when I'm feeling a bit lazy, C4:heh:
I'd always mix through the stuff I put in the master bus.
 
He puts it on when the mix is done for glue and then a compressor -3db or so,
as i said the meaning of mbc on the mstr bus is not to resuce a bad mix put to improve a good mix

Cheers
 
Yeah you should notice some "glue" effect if the MBC is applied correct. TC's MD3 is the shit btw kicks waves ass bigtime ;) Mabye a bit expensive but you get a multiband comp, mstr bus comp, limiter and a tape simulator all at once, worht checking out..

Cheers