Originally posted by Static
I cannot really think of what to put in my signature that would be of interest in any of the posts that I may wish to place onto this website in the hope of witty repartee or serious discussion, so therefore I have decided to simply write that I will not have a signature. I apologise for I realise the passing interest that a witty or even humorous signature could hold for you, the other users on these forums, and to show how sorry I am I submit this essay on the theorems of why a signature is not required. You see, a signature is something used to convey a sense of yourself to others, in not using one I have forsaken its usage. Certainly a subversion of these values (the values concerning signatures, which can be found in my book "How Signatures Define Social and Economic Structure Through Rigid Moral Values" (based on a case study of the French Revolution in 1789)) is therotically justified, as when we think about it, what is a signature but the residual essence of yourself as a humanoid life-being consisting predominantly of water? Are our souls not tied to the non-contested but painfully arbitrary notion of an essence defining our existance? I see this as a non-essential, my own self is defined not in petty words, but in the creation of my inner being through a militantly structured thought pattern regulation process (see pages 57-68 of my book, Chapter 4: Militantly Structured Thought Pattern Regulations). This is gained through music and understanding of the world through trial and error, as well as listening to the moons cosmic night song personified in sunbeams. Not petty signatures. Therefore, I wish not to have a signature, thank you.
