I don't want someone to see me on here, think that I'm going to respond to one of their posts, and then go kill themselves out of sorrow when I don't!
Neil
Everywhere else on the Internet, everyone is in "invisible mode": when you're browsing cnn.com or dykeswithdicks.com, you have no idea who else is also viewing it. And that's always worked out just fine.
So there must be some reason that forum-makers decided "hey, we should show everyone who is viewing the pages!" I'm just curious what those reasons may have been. What are the advantages that you get out of it?
It's nothing to do with being "anonymous", which is a different concept than "invisible". And once I'm registered and logged-in, I'm not going to go through the effort of logging out to achieve what I think should just be standard operating procedure. So I just choose the option that feels like the least invasion of my privacy.
I don't want someone to see me on here, think that I'm going to respond to one of their posts, and then go kill themselves out of sorrow when I don't!
Neil
I don't want someone to see me on here, think that I'm going to respond to one of their posts, and then go kill themselves out of sorrow when I don't!
Huh, that's a funny way to look at it I suppose.
I understand what you're saying in regards to cnn.com, because it's one way traffic, but surely that logic doesn't apply to chat forums where it needs to thrive on interaction? :zombie: Doesn't it inherently defeat the purpose of not knowing who you're chatting with UNTIL they make a post?
It's like standing in a bar, surrounded by friends, and you've all got your eyes closed. And the one person not saying anything is basically just evesdropping. Kinda odd.
Which makes it all the more ironic that you would think it's your privacy that's being invaded. Hot diggity damn!