Iridium said:
Silver Incubus, you have not answered my question.
By the way, if any of you are fervent enough believers in these conspiracy theories that you want to formally debate them, I welcome you to do so at IIDB:
http://www.iidb.org/vbb/forumdisplay.php?f=75
You didn't ask me a question, as I am not a conspiracy theorist. Like I said before, I look for the truth, and not conspiracies. And to think that some of the things they bring up aren't true is just as bad as the Christians refusing to believe that the world was created billions of years ago. I keep an open mind which means I don't judge people based off of other people conceptions and labels. And to think that the government will tell the truth is just about as trusting as having a partner who cheats on you multiple times and says they won't do it again, except for later that night, and the day after. The gov has admitted to lying in the past, which at the time people believed to the truth, because it was the official explanation.
The fact of the matter is, people whom wield the power and connections tend to become corrupt. In a capitalist society, you almost expect the government to be corrupt because money is what gives you power in a capitalist society. I think there are plenty of good politicians in most countries, people who actually serve the people, care about the issues of their people etc. There are also a lot of those corrupt ones, and some of them don't care for their people at all, and they use terror and other means to keep the people in line.
I don't make the conspiracy conclusions; I look at evidence that has been provided and make my decisions based on what I find to yield the most truth. There are people in the government who do speak out, and expose the under dealings going on behind closed doors for the benefit of money and/or power.
I don't know if you watched that video on that link I posted, but that is a legitimate physics professor from Utah University, and he proves some very interesting facts about physics and how it was very improbable that all 3 collapse because of fires.
The way that the interviewer, Douchy McBowtie, acted, it almost seemed that he was trying to stall him, as if the subject was taboo or something, I mean its pretty rude to keep interrupting someone like that, in the middle of a sentence.
Anyways I let the evidence speak for itself. You can choose not to believe in the evidence, but it seems almost illogical to think that everything someone says isn't true because someone has labeled them a conspiracy theorist and is the same as any hearsay you hear in local gossip.
