Achernar
Ego-Boosted Southlander
Yeah. That would be the thing to do. Even though I think it should have been done when AFDTE came out.
Strangelight said:I thought it was a good set, apart from about 3 tracks. Strange atmosphere too, which I liked. The band seem to have found a direction now so leave them to it.
marginalé said:yes, i remeber laughing, i couldn't stop
but don't know the joke anymore
so, tell me again
eh I understand the fact that you want to hear some of the old songs...but many of us here want(ed) to hear how the new songs sound live, the old ones were probably heard once or twice live...I agree there should be more mixing of old and new songs..but the set list was great and i wish i was there!flosskki said:Oh dear....that's the end of that so (well for me anyway). I saw the setlist, sorry, but to me it's pretty awful. Too much of the (extremely weak for the most part) new CD, and little to please the fans the supported the band all along the way- thats the thanks you get! I agree with the 'not-playing-a-dying-wish' thing: it's not the only good song from 'back when they were worth listening to' though! There are plenty other contenders.
Ryan adams did somthing In dublin a few weeks ago - he played all unknown songs for the crowd that paid hard cash to see him and hear the songs they like in the live environment. Had I gone to london i would have felt somthing similar to that I think. Next time Anathema make the effort (and fair play to them) to come to Dublin, I for one won't bother me arse driving the 160 miles to hear songs I (and many others) believe to be weak and lacking. Maiden played this day last week, I drove, they played 7 of their new songs- and a burst of the classics people want to hear. That's the way to do it - *that's* worth spending your few bob on
ooh yeah,cedarbreed said:i think you wanted me to dedicate a song to you on december 20th and introduce you as the 5th official Breaklose member or something like that
marginalé said:ooh yeah,
i was thinking about it a whole weak to say that, and i finaly did, so sorry,
hahahahahahaha
(don't take it to serriuos hahaha)
hé, if you don't wanne come back after this one, .................cedarbreed said:To late mate I WILL DO IT ... hope i will have a mike available
Im talking about the atmosphere :Smug:cedarbreed said:Strange atmosphere ? Are you talking about the band or the crowd ? I though both were special their own way.
I don't get it I don't get it I don't get it..... There are enough bands that were able to evolve the way you want Anathema to do without changing the name at all. Take The Gathering for example. They started as a doom-death metal band much like Anathema's early days, they are completely different right now, and their metal past doesn't really follow them that much (Except for the Mandylion album but it's so good that it can't be ignored). I dunno if they've got the success they deserve, but hey, how many bands are there actually who do? There are other possibilities than changing the band's name. I'd say that they shouldn't do the Biebob anymore but I'm afraid it's either that or nothing at all here in Belgium... They should call the boys of Radiohead and say "hey we're going on tour with you next year! " they'll answer "allrighty, see yous then" and then they'll smile and nod Problem solved again.flosskkii said:But without a doubt - the name should change - and should have done so a while ago. Let the Metal band 'Anathema' be what it was, for clearly it no longer is anything like that, and let another new band be 'formed' that by coincidence, happens to have the same members as 'Anathema' once had
marginalé said:hé, if you don't wanne come back after this one, .................
Strangelight said:Im talking about the atmosphere :Smug: