i aint play this
Member
I really love Mike in the gayest way possible(Affinityband too iirc), he is a such a classy guy, i'm his biggest fanboi, nobody touches me fyi
cheersMikael Åkerfeldt;6003119 said:Hi guys!
Well, he has the right to think it's going to suck or whatever, and to be honest if he lingers on those two records (MR and MAYH) he probably will think the new stuff sucks regardless of what we do. In those days I didn't really have a forum in which to keep in touch with the people who liked our music and was never given the chance to say what the new stuff "sounded like". If I could have I'd said the whole of the MR album was created because I was listening to Steeleye span, Mellow candle, Wes Montgomery, Folque, Kebnekajse. Judas Priest, Scorpions, Bathory and At the gates. MAYH was created on a healthy dose of Bathory (always, fucking always), Robin Trower, Porcupine tree, Alphonse Mouzon, King Diamond, Pink Floyd and Morbid Angel.
I can't help it. I listen to music all the time and it influence me to that extent that the only references I have is from other bands. I can't say "That new part" and "The other new part"...I always find a reference in other bands or a mishmash of bands. It certainly doesn't mean that I write something that sounds exactly like...Bathory. It's just a reference that sometimes can be based on one chord, one note, one beat, one pause...something, anything, nothing. Most of you will never hear why I called it "that" in the first place! You can be calm, it won't be more of a rip off album or uninspired shit than any of the other records we've done. But I can't guarantee you'll like it or deem it "progressive" enough. I'll await judgement...
Cheers + hope you're all well, including the "non-believers"...
Mike
Let's just lay it down now - if it isn't amazing, people will say it is nonetheless. Same thing if Cradle of Filth actually put out something amazing - people will still say it sucks. Some people just can't think for themselves.
Well that's the thing - it's all down to personal taste. I don't find it a particularly creative approach, and Opeth have succeeded in the past and shown they don't have to resort to that. The trend is that the more a band gets on in years the more effort is needed to keep creative, even though the possibilities are greater. Don't you find it funny that most bands fail to capitalise on that and get worse as they go on? I feel Opeth could benefit from a more "top-down" approach given their talent. Would be a waste to have something sounding like a bunch of other bands with the "opeth touch" (which was never about a talent for combining different things anyway - there was definitely a spark there no other band had). Anyway, there's no hope of me influencing Mike and as I said, it's a personal thing.
I hate to burst your bubble man, but music is all about ripping off other musicians before them.. early folk music societies have shown that musicians keep tradition alive by "borrowing" or recreating the music made by others. People passed on oral traditions long before music was written down, so therefore gl finding ANY band out there that doesn't borrow elements of music from other bands/musicians.. Every once in a while you'll find a band that sounds really original, and you'll say wow ive never heard this before, but sure enough if you dig deep enough you are gonna find roots of music somewhere. The difference with Mikael is that he admits where he gets his influences. At least he's paying a little bit of tribute to those bands he apparantly "rips off".
What the fuck?! Are you retarded or just plain old fucked up? NO! If Cradle released something amazing, i would bloody well say so! Damnation And A Day was flat out amazing, But Thornography, is to my taste, pure shite. Now I think that Blackwater Park is amazing, and GR will never be as good, but that's just my opinion! Why the hell would people have been bagging out GR all of the time?
ftlog stop being such an attention seeker already
Hi guys!
Well, he has the right to think it's going to suck or whatever, and to be honest if he lingers on those two records (MR and MAYH) he probably will think the new stuff sucks regardless of what we do. In those days I didn't really have a forum in which to keep in touch with the people who liked our music and was never given the chance to say what the new stuff "sounded like". If I could have I'd said the whole of the MR album was created because I was listening to Steeleye span, Mellow candle, Wes Montgomery, Folque, Kebnekajse. Judas Priest, Scorpions, Bathory and At the gates. MAYH was created on a healthy dose of Bathory (always, fucking always), Robin Trower, Porcupine tree, Alphonse Mouzon, King Diamond, Pink Floyd and Morbid Angel.
I can't help it. I listen to music all the time and it influence me to that extent that the only references I have is from other bands. I can't say "That new part" and "The other new part"...I always find a reference in other bands or a mishmash of bands. It certainly doesn't mean that I write something that sounds exactly like...Bathory. It's just a reference that sometimes can be based on one chord, one note, one beat, one pause...something, anything, nothing. Most of you will never hear why I called it "that" in the first place! You can be calm, it won't be more of a rip off album or uninspired shit than any of the other records we've done. But I can't guarantee you'll like it or deem it "progressive" enough. I'll await judgement...
Cheers + hope you're all well, including the "non-believers"...
Mike
i'm his biggest fanboi, nobody touches me fyi
I find it sad that, recently, 90% of the time when Mikael posts, it's to defend his decisions from something a fan has said here.
wrong. i am opeth and mikes biggest fanboy.
hey i never posted that! quit mis-quoting me!
When Beethoven was writing his 5th did he write in his blog "oh i'll just combine a little Bach, some Scarlatti chops and a touch of Mozart, I think my fans will be really impressed" No! There's a difference between drawing on influences to create an original work (MAYH), and defining a work solely by reference to those influences (~100% of modern music). Music is not a recipe with a certain number of ingredients, the ratio of which conditions its quality.
and BOOM this thread jumps 10 pages over night. haha
yes, mike is def very down to earth. How many band leaders at the height of where mike is right now would continue to post on a fan message board filled with as many morons that plague this message board.