DSS3 said:Erm... Weren't they the first to impliment it?
dude, i've been subscribing to podcasts for a good while now.MKS said:No. They hired someone to get them to that point from Microsoft. That is the only reason I didn't buy an Ipod in the first place.
Awesome, I shall get one. Thanksetlgfx said:much much much much better, very little noticable distortion at high volumes, excellent EQ settings, and a load of extra sound enhancing functions: "BBE, Surround, Mach3Bass, MPEnhance"
I just use the EQ to compensate for what frequencies my earphones lack, and let my audio files do the rest.
Cowon is pretty much known for great sound quality players. You could also consider the newer iAudio U3, except it has shorter battery life because of the Li-ion battery instead of AA battery. Go to iaudio.com to compare their specs, see what you want, you can order them from amazon.com or jetaudio.com in the states.
James Murphy said:dude, i've been subscribing to podcasts for a good while now.
James Murphy said:and i still say, if you own your music, which you should, then all those other codecs are totally unecessary.
James Murphy said:and my bad on the subscription service thing... i don't care for that type of thing and would never likely subscribe, so i just don't know much about it... and likely never will.
MKS said:It's good for me since I can check out most bands before buying the CD. If I like it, I usually buy the CD. The record companies still get a kickback everytime I listen to each track. Not much, but better than nothing.
It really is a great service.