- Apr 17, 2005
- 1,191
- 2
- 38
This came up in discussion with DC in another thread, so why not expand?
I am not a racial, or individual, egalitarian. I recognize that all people are different and some are more competent at others in the three ways that count:
1. Intelligence
2. Strength/Beauty
3. Moral Character
I am a complete biological determinist. You are 80% determined by your genetics, with 20% free space in which you can either improve yourself or decrease yourself (cycle of karma). If you work upward, over generations, you can make something more of yourself; this is how we went from bacteria to chimps, and chimps to humans.
I am not interested, however, in classifying other races are lesser, for two reasons:
I. It's bad science.
What is the objective purpose of life? It cannot be determined. Therefore it's hard for us to rank superior/inferior except according to our own values and for our own purposes.
II. It's bad nationalism.
If Asians and Whites are superior, why not breed with them and make an ueberrace, as Nietzsche jokingly suggests? What about a black guy with an IQ of 160 - shouldn't we breed with him? FUCK NO. We breed only among ourselves, and there's no variance on that issue.
There's another reason as well, although a tangential one. To think too categorically about this issue is to miss the point: we want to breed better whites, too, and not all stripes of whites should be bred together. If we mix Slavs and Germans and Italians and Irish into one pot, we basically accomplish what our enemies wanted us to: we've obliterated our heritage and become generic people who will in due time become interbred with others. We must breed not only tactically (breed with own race) but strategically (breed according to developed trait clusters, and breed for the best we can get within our own tribes).
Nationalism to me is the ability to say "I don't give a damn if Negroes are the best people on earth; my own tribe stays my own tribe." I'm not a "Pan-Aryan"; I laugh at such ideas, which are generally only endorsed by low-quality people who want to feel that they are equal to the mighty Aryans. That's like saying I should go to Harvard because a distant cousin did... it's not eugenic, nor is it nationalism.
This doesn't mean the bottom line changes. Multiculturalism is insane and will destroy my people; I wish to destroy it, by any means necessary. Judaism is an alien religion and Jews are alien genetics; they must be removed from among my people, by any means necessary. I feel the same way, as did Dr. Pierce, about most Christian and Buddhist sects. However, I'm pragmatic about what I do, and about what most white people feel.
Most white people aren't interested in slagging other races. They respond more to a positive message about their own, and having the balls to say "I want to be with my own people" takes more guts than to complain about how Negroes, etc. are bad and therefore we can "justify" what we're doing. WE DO NOT NEED TO JUSTIFY ANYTHING. Our survival is all we must know. Also, most white people now have friends of other races and they recognize the positive traits of these people. So do I - I don't feel a need to disdain them, only to separate them from our people.
If you want to kvetch about "racial egalitarianism," I suppose you might have a point to some. To me, the big picture is about building up our own race and separating it, and the drama and egoism of superior/inferior does not have a necessary place in that. I care only about the end result. Everything else is just distraction.
http://www.vnnforum.com/showthread.php?t=21207
I am not a racial, or individual, egalitarian. I recognize that all people are different and some are more competent at others in the three ways that count:
1. Intelligence
2. Strength/Beauty
3. Moral Character
I am a complete biological determinist. You are 80% determined by your genetics, with 20% free space in which you can either improve yourself or decrease yourself (cycle of karma). If you work upward, over generations, you can make something more of yourself; this is how we went from bacteria to chimps, and chimps to humans.
I am not interested, however, in classifying other races are lesser, for two reasons:
I. It's bad science.
What is the objective purpose of life? It cannot be determined. Therefore it's hard for us to rank superior/inferior except according to our own values and for our own purposes.
II. It's bad nationalism.
If Asians and Whites are superior, why not breed with them and make an ueberrace, as Nietzsche jokingly suggests? What about a black guy with an IQ of 160 - shouldn't we breed with him? FUCK NO. We breed only among ourselves, and there's no variance on that issue.
There's another reason as well, although a tangential one. To think too categorically about this issue is to miss the point: we want to breed better whites, too, and not all stripes of whites should be bred together. If we mix Slavs and Germans and Italians and Irish into one pot, we basically accomplish what our enemies wanted us to: we've obliterated our heritage and become generic people who will in due time become interbred with others. We must breed not only tactically (breed with own race) but strategically (breed according to developed trait clusters, and breed for the best we can get within our own tribes).
Nationalism to me is the ability to say "I don't give a damn if Negroes are the best people on earth; my own tribe stays my own tribe." I'm not a "Pan-Aryan"; I laugh at such ideas, which are generally only endorsed by low-quality people who want to feel that they are equal to the mighty Aryans. That's like saying I should go to Harvard because a distant cousin did... it's not eugenic, nor is it nationalism.
This doesn't mean the bottom line changes. Multiculturalism is insane and will destroy my people; I wish to destroy it, by any means necessary. Judaism is an alien religion and Jews are alien genetics; they must be removed from among my people, by any means necessary. I feel the same way, as did Dr. Pierce, about most Christian and Buddhist sects. However, I'm pragmatic about what I do, and about what most white people feel.
Most white people aren't interested in slagging other races. They respond more to a positive message about their own, and having the balls to say "I want to be with my own people" takes more guts than to complain about how Negroes, etc. are bad and therefore we can "justify" what we're doing. WE DO NOT NEED TO JUSTIFY ANYTHING. Our survival is all we must know. Also, most white people now have friends of other races and they recognize the positive traits of these people. So do I - I don't feel a need to disdain them, only to separate them from our people.
If you want to kvetch about "racial egalitarianism," I suppose you might have a point to some. To me, the big picture is about building up our own race and separating it, and the drama and egoism of superior/inferior does not have a necessary place in that. I care only about the end result. Everything else is just distraction.
http://www.vnnforum.com/showthread.php?t=21207