Moonshield_
Member
I tried. Mainly because I felt bad for calling you out earlier and your reply was endearing.
I hated it just as much as the first time. Just painful.
Ahah thanks for the effort. So do you rank SC and Battles above Foregone?
I tried. Mainly because I felt bad for calling you out earlier and your reply was endearing.
I hated it just as much as the first time. Just painful.
Ok ok ok, probably this is directed at me. Maybe I was a bit too harsh.
I shouldn’t have said that they were already out of ideas at Clayman. I should have said they were starting to run out of ideas around the time of Clayman. They certainly had enough to finish the album, and had a number of good songs. But to me the density of riffs/solos/new ideas doesn’t compare with the early albums. I think they got Clayman recorded just before the point of diminishing returns.
And it’s not just the production value, but I think Nordstrom squeezed them hard at recording to get every last drop of music possible.
So that’s why I think without Nordstrom, the album would not have been that great.
Ahah thanks for the effort. So do you rank SC and Battles above Foregone?
How many times did you listen to ITM?I don't remember. I only listened to those albums once. Battles I couldn't even finish the first time I tried, so I guess this one is better.
But it doesn't really matter, all 3 of these albums are bad enough that I wouldn't listen to them in almost any circumstance. I am not in any way complimenting Foregone - it is a putrid, steaming, ass bomb.
The fakery is annoying.Cleans are definitely the worst they've ever been in terms of being fake and stupid. If I want to listen to somebody sing properly I have a ton of bands in my playlist who have genuinely talented singers. I'm more than happy for Anders to do his amateur sounding cleans, as they're endearing enough in their own way as long as the music is also good. I don't want this overprocessed, autotuned shit attempting to fool people into thinking Anders can sing with any degree of proficiency.
Ok ok ok, probably this is directed at me. Maybe I was a bit too harsh.
I shouldn’t have said that they were already out of ideas at Clayman. I should have said they were starting to run out of ideas around the time of Clayman. They certainly had enough to finish the album, and had a number of good songs. But to me the density of riffs/solos/new ideas doesn’t compare with the early albums. I think they got Clayman recorded just before the point of diminishing returns.
And it’s not just the production value, but I think Nordstrom squeezed them hard at recording to get every last drop of music possible.
So that’s why I think without Nordstrom, the album would not have been that great.
How many times did you listen to ITM?
When they recorded Clayman they yet had in mind something similar to R2R. It was Nordstrom that told them no and that made Jesper mad because he doesn't like to work.
Not bad, not bad.Once. Same with the Clayman re-releases. But after listening to Clayman (the song) and Only for the Weak, I couldn't listen to the rest. I couldn't believe how bad they were. There were also a few other releases that I didn't bother listening to at all.
I was actually surprised by how many comments were critical of the clean vocals on the IF subreddit. Usually those guys are sucking the IF schlong JesterHead style, but a lot of similar comments on there about how ridiculous the cleans sound as well.
I've already done my rankings a few pages back, haven't listened to the album since so nothing's changed.
1. The Beginning.
2. Everything else.
It's weird because live, Anders sounded like a fucking beast. It actually blew me away. I've seen so many metal shows, and that was straight up insane. He could have unleashed these beastly growls on an album!