But how does anyone listen to Moonshield and not recognize that TJR is in a different universe than LS? Are you familiar with those (imo 100% fake) videos on youtube where people record their first time listening to some popular music? If I was shown some TJR bangers like Moonshield, Artifacts, December Flower or Dead Eternity for the first time, I would make the same faces those guys do, which look like they are being anally fisted, but they enjoy it a lot. TJR has 10/10 melodies, depth, an actual (albeit to me still very much so crude) production, while also having that youthful energy and willingness to experiment which only debut albums can have. TJR would be a legit contender for being the very best old-school mdm records out there, whilst LS' name would not even come up.
Moonshield and December Flower are two of my favorite IF songs, so that much is a pretty good point. TJR’s high points are definitely infinitely higher, and it does make sense that it is discussed to this day while LS isn’t. But when I feel that I just don’t enjoy three out of the ten songs, one being the closing track, it brings down my impression of it significantly. If we were to include Black Ash Inheritance with TJR, it’d absolutely beat out LS since Goliaths and Acoustic Medley are two more of my favorite IF songs, and I end up enjoying ten out of thirteen tracks by that point.
But I guess in a way, I don’t really believe that common discourse necessarily correlates to quality (Or a lack thereof when there isn’t any)— Some of my favorite albums are generally neglected by their fanbases or as a whole, and sometimes overrated pieces of shit get
way too much time in the limelight. I don’t think that means LS is the best of the best, since it isn’t, but I just enjoy what I enjoy, and I do enjoy it in spite of its faults. I’ll always acknowledge its faults and how those being down the listening experience, but I’ll (hopefully) still enjoy it.
Also, damn, the title track’s my favorite song on the album. I respect your opinion, but damn.
Also, you shouldn't have A- categories, because it gives room for some cop-out decisions. An A- should either be A or B.
That’s a pretty good point, though I really didn’t want to push everything in A- through C down a tier. Reroute is definitely better than D tier, though I think STYE is in at least one tier above it— But then I don’t feel that albums like Clayman and TJR should drop down to the same tier as STYE. They’re far better objectively, and depending on my mood subjectively too. ITM could absolutely be a B tier album if I had to condense them, though I also don’t feel like I’d put Clayman and TJR, albums which have great highlights but multiple tracks I’d instantly skip in with an album like Colony, where Resin is the only sour spot for me. I know this is definitely overthinking it, but I’d prefer to just take the caveat of a grading curve over making my opinions appear more negative than they actually are. I love In Flames, they’re my favorite band even with the shit they’ve put out since 2014. I feel like I acknowledge all of their colossal fuckups enough, maybe even more harshly than I should at times. Probably not since House exists, but you know.
If I really had to put A- albums in different tiers, I think Clayman would be in A and ITM in B. I’m not sure where TJR and LS would end up, but
maybe it’d be A. I think Colony and Subterranean are quite a ways better than everything A-, but that’s just prolonging the discussion more than it needs to be.