Ermz
¯\(°_o)/¯
My signature has my Nebula thread, which is probably the single largest resource on the intarwebs about using Nebula for cab modeling.
I still maintain that it's a great sound. I don't think it sounds better than traditional impulses because it's actively modeling speaker thump or anything, but for some reason, when impulses and Nebula programs made from the same equipment, position and conditions, one right after the other, the Nebula stuff just seems to come through with a little more life and response.
You can hear it in blind tests. My mic/Nebula/impulse comparisons show that the sounds are very close, but each have identifying characteristics that really make it the mixer's preference at this point.
The ONLY problem that I have with Nebula at the moment is the latency. The newer Core II Nebula came out, and I upgraded to that, and it feels faster, but I still don't think it's fast enough.
Has there been any mention on why they sound so different to the actual cab/impulse? We've been waiting for months now on some word and/or progress in that regard.
Props to you for keeping it all going though.