nafnikufesin said:Yeah, lead vs. rhythm is like comparing apples and oranges. Kirk's solos were unmatchable, back in the day when he played solos, as opposed to playing a single riff over and over and over for 6 or 7 minutes on each nauseating track on St. Anger
Mr. Wu said:A better contest would be who can drink more sake.
among_the_dead said:well since kirk is a lead guitarist and scott is a rythm guitarist the question is impossible to answer.
Kirk is(WAS)a good lead player.
Scott is a brilliant rythm player.
Agreed!
so tue. stevie ray vaughn can bend one note or, play a fast ass blues fill and be a great lead player. it's feel and approach that make a great guitarist not how many notes fit in measure. james is still the king of rythm. the guy is tight as fuck. scott very close second. kirk is a lead guitarist so i can't compare him to scott.2) fast leads show nothing of a player's quality.
karrokid said:johnnieCzech wrote:
so tue. stevie ray vaughn can bend one note or, play a fast ass blues fill and be a great lead player. it's feel and approach that make a great guitarist not how many notes fit in measure. james is still the king of rythm. the guy is tight as fuck. scott very close second. kirk is a lead guitarist so i can't compare him to scott.
DarbysDad said:I'm still sad about the night I got thrown out of the Santa Monica Civic on the ATL tour and my friends come out and Kirk played God Save the Queen as an encore with Anthrax.