I had a listen to the interview again just now and managed to figure out the last piece that I couldn't quite make out the first times around:
Notice the [?] after Peter's 12:40 line? "rätt upp och ner" should be "rätt uppenbar" and thus the translation should be "apparant" instead of "straightforward".
And of course, godisanathiest's spelling corretion, and I found out the exact date of the interview was 2002-01-10 (and no, that's not in the stupid u.s date format).
(Yes, the u.s date format is stupid! The are months to a year and days to a month. There are also days to a year, but there are NO months to a day. What would happen if we all started writing decimals for numbers with hundredths as first digit and tenths as second? 1.75 would become 1.57 and still mean the same thing.... silly.)
All done in downloadable version here.
Also, if you want the mp3 of the interview, you can find me in #goddess on irc.openprojects.net
Notice the [?] after Peter's 12:40 line? "rätt upp och ner" should be "rätt uppenbar" and thus the translation should be "apparant" instead of "straightforward".
And of course, godisanathiest's spelling corretion, and I found out the exact date of the interview was 2002-01-10 (and no, that's not in the stupid u.s date format).
(Yes, the u.s date format is stupid! The are months to a year and days to a month. There are also days to a year, but there are NO months to a day. What would happen if we all started writing decimals for numbers with hundredths as first digit and tenths as second? 1.75 would become 1.57 and still mean the same thing.... silly.)
All done in downloadable version here.
Also, if you want the mp3 of the interview, you can find me in #goddess on irc.openprojects.net
