Phew, just failed my endurance test..

[Darknight6606]

Haha Im not trying to revive actually, I didnt find out until yesterday that If I commented on an old thread it brought it up to the front. I can stop if you want me to though

 

[Darknight6606]

And thanks Aletheus, but if he wants me to stop, then alright

 

[SeaStorm]

I never understood why reviving old threads was a social faux pas.

Example #1 (from another thread):

October 2009:

Hey Matt, Any chance at all of "Nailed" appearing on the new CD? Let me know, OK?

Someone bumps 2 year old thread today for no good reason.

Unsuspecting reader today:

Where have you been? Yes, it's on the new album. Everyone knows that by now!

Moral of the story: bumps to old threads are OK when done judiciously and for good reason. There needs to be a good reason because they cause a ton of the confusion for the people who read all the threads daily.

 

[Darknight6606]

Actually I only commented on it to defend dragonforce!
(just in my defense, I wasnt going to comment otherwise)

 

[Aletheus]

Yeah but what about threads that don't belong in a certain period of time... if we were to discuss hairstyles from the 80s everyone should be able to join in and speak their mind.

 

[Arkatox]

Now I feel stupid for replying to something old. Thanks a lot, SeaStorm.

 

[Darknight6606]

hmmm..............yeah i guess