Pro Tools 9
- Thread starter Jarkko Mattheiszen
- Start date
Let it burn...
Orgasm Donor
I've read somewhere that offline bouncing is not possible with the DAE engine.
I've also noticed that plugins (especially compressors) react much better when you bounce in real time + how to fuck will you bounce offline if you're using outboard? I always bounce real-time in Logic too
I've also noticed that plugins (especially compressors) react much better when you bounce in real time + how to fuck will you bounce offline if you're using outboard? I always bounce real-time in Logic too
Fox Mulder
The Truth Is Out There
Seriously? I always thought they were cumulative, as my reader always shows. Am I missing something here?
Example:
Suppose I put in 2 instances of Waves Rcomp on a track. That plugin has a latency of 64 samples. Do you mean to say that the delay for 2 instances of plugin would be 64 and not 128?
It shows 128, though.
Edit: Sorry, my bad.
Ah fuck you know what you are right. I am thinking overall across all tracks but yes, plugins do add cumulative latency when they are stacked on the same track, they have to.
Sorry guys, I made a wrong
TheDriller
Member
well yeah, if you are using outboard you're stuck with Real-time anyway.
However, i did a set of null tests before that proved that there is no difference between Real-time and Offline bouncing. a few others in the thread repeated the tests in different daws and got the same result.
the only exception are plugins that have a random element, like some reverbs, which will never bounce the same way twice anyway, regardless of whether its realtime or offline.
Fox Mulder
The Truth Is Out There
The kind of people Avid targets, they're not really the 100% ITB type. Most 'big-guy' pro tools production have a lot of outboard processing going on. And yeh, time dependent plugins do work better in real-time.
I can't really grasp that reverb thing you said, though.
Skinny Viking
¯\(°_o)/¯ How do Lydian?
He is saying everything bounces the same regardless of realtime or offline except for certain reverbs - but it's because they produce a different result every time so you cannot perform a null test on bounces with those on them, is all.
AdamWathan
Member
What happened to, "PTHD is expensive because it's pro, stop bitching that it costs $250,000 to get ADC, it's worth it, the worst thing AVID could ever do is remove the hardware dependency, etc."
http://www.ultimatemetal.com/forum/...teresting-pro-tools-tidbit-2.html#post9304912
Damn it feels good that a multi-million dollar company finally did exactly what I said they should do, down to the T! Good on them, I will be upgrading soon I know it, even though I NEVER use Pro Tools and probably never will
Soooo happy that they finally killed all the mid level lines and finally just created "Pro Tools" and have a tiered hardware system instead of tiered software. It is soooo much more logical and even the new toolkit makes sense because it's a lot of features that are specific to certain users instead of features that EVERYONE wants. It caters mostly to post facilities now who can drop the cash on it no problem.
Seth Munson
How do Amber Lamps?
Im pretty sure at the end of the live stream someone asked a question about offline bouncing and they said they are working on it.
it was on the "next" list of things to get to because they were addressing the main things people wanted first.
it was on the "next" list of things to get to because they were addressing the main things people wanted first.
Pedro Teixeira
Member
Fox Mulder
The Truth Is Out There
TheDriller
Member
AdamWathan
Member
Yeah everyone can calm down about these other features for a minute... They stated that the stuff at the top of the "ideascale" FR site is on their radar and will be getting looked at. They can't really make promises like that publicly so they have to be careful with what they say, but they seem to be working hard to please customers now and it doesn't make sense to ignore what the customers want so I'm sure we'll see it sooner than later.
The PTHD crack that came out was a game changer for them and pushed PT9 way ahead of schedule. 8.5 was supposed to be the next release but they hauled ass to get PT9 out the door this early instead, so give them a little bit of a break while they start working on what's next... They just brought about some MASSIVE changes in PT9, give a little credit where credit is due.
Seth Munson
How do Amber Lamps?
Ok, so those of you that have PT9. How is it? Stable on non-avid hardware? how is the ADC? any complaints?
Im working on getting mine later in the day, Im just really anxious for it.
Im working on getting mine later in the day, Im just really anxious for it.
::XeS::
Member
Let it burn...
Orgasm Donor
I'm a big Pro Tools fan and used it a ton but I've been happy with the switch to Logic 9 atm. I'll probably upgrade to pro tools 9 but not anytime soon, probably when I get a new Mac
SocialNumb
Damn Christians!
Wow, woke up to all the excitement that is PT9 and learned about it a bit. Then I did a quick google search and well . . .
Joshua Wickman
Yes Sir!
Ok, so those of you that have PT9. How is it? Stable on non-avid hardware? how is the ADC? any complaints?
Im working on getting mine later in the day, Im just really anxious for it.
So far so good! Protools 9 is instaled and works.
Im still installing all my plugins and making sure i have all the latest updates and all that good stuff. Going to catch a hour or two of sleep and then try this thing they call protools 9 on my big mix im working on and see how it goes.
